Ok, I'm confused as shit here. I'm missing something important. Can someone help my dumb ass out here?
I thought that the only thing that happened was the names on the list (at least some of them) were made public. Everyone already knew the lists existed, so it's not some huge surprise.
And is Trump on the list or not? The MSM is saying he was on there, some Anons here are saying he wasn't, some are saying he was, but somehow it's different than the others.
There was a list of people's names that were mentioned in documents. Trump's name was mentioned because a victim was asked at deposition if Trump had ever been to the Island and the answer was: No. Ever to the NY mansion (or was it Florida?): No. Ever to the Ranch? No.
Yes, in another post someone explained that to me.
The issue I have is that there are many people on that list of names that were just released that had similar stories.
But the problem is that if you listen to people here talk about it, everyone on those lists are guilty of going to Epstein's island and being involved with the child sex trafficking.
And when people point out that Trump is on those same lists, the response is "Oh, he doesn't count because he never actually went to the island." But they ignore the possibility that there might be other stories like his, and just say everyone else on the list is guilty.
I see people saying that Bill Clinton is a pedophile because his name is on that list, yet it's a scenario like Trump's where he never actually went to the island. But people don't care about his context.
Ok, I'm confused as shit here. I'm missing something important. Can someone help my dumb ass out here?
I thought that the only thing that happened was the names on the list (at least some of them) were made public. Everyone already knew the lists existed, so it's not some huge surprise.
And is Trump on the list or not? The MSM is saying he was on there, some Anons here are saying he wasn't, some are saying he was, but somehow it's different than the others.
There was a list of people's names that were mentioned in documents. Trump's name was mentioned because a victim was asked at deposition if Trump had ever been to the Island and the answer was: No. Ever to the NY mansion (or was it Florida?): No. Ever to the Ranch? No.
Yes, in another post someone explained that to me.
The issue I have is that there are many people on that list of names that were just released that had similar stories.
But the problem is that if you listen to people here talk about it, everyone on those lists are guilty of going to Epstein's island and being involved with the child sex trafficking.
And when people point out that Trump is on those same lists, the response is "Oh, he doesn't count because he never actually went to the island." But they ignore the possibility that there might be other stories like his, and just say everyone else on the list is guilty.
I see people saying that Bill Clinton is a pedophile because his name is on that list, yet it's a scenario like Trump's where he never actually went to the island. But people don't care about his context.
Do you see the issue here?