Understandable. Wikipedia is also essentially functions the same in many instances.
Even as a propaganda machine, if you look far enough back, they've been eating their own for decades.
That's all.
The Huffpost piece shows that Fauci ran the same op in the 80's that he ran this time around with familiar consequences, e.g.: slandering a medication that works for medication that was personally profitable to him to the detriment of the people he claims he was 'helping.'
If I posted sources from the 'right', which are already available to everyone, the 'left' can just slander it as 'misinformation' or 'fake news'. If it's posted from one of their "Trusted Sources" they have much less footing to argue with and usually take it as scripture. If I can get them to dispose of their own propaganda rag, that's just an auxiliary 'plus' in the long run.
It probably doesn't work all too well, but that's my rationale.
Understandable. Wikipedia is also essentially functions the same in many instances.
Even as a propaganda machine, if you look far enough back, they've been eating their own for decades.
That's all.
The Huffpost piece shows that Fauci ran the same op in the 80's that he ran this time around with familiar consequences, e.g.: slandering a medication that works for medication that was personally profitable to him to the detriment of the people he claims he was 'helping.'
If I posted sources from the 'right', which are already available to everyone, the 'left' can just slander it as 'misinformation' or 'fake news'. If it's posted from one of their "Trusted Sources" they have much less footing to argue with and usually take it as scripture. If I can get them to dispose of their own propaganda rag, that's just an auxiliary 'plus' in the long run.
It probably doesn't work all too well, but that's my rationale.
I totally agree, these fact checker web sites were supporting the DS BS as being fact. Great points and reminders. Thank you.