INSURRECTION🚨 AIDS activists shattered the doors of the National Institute of Health in 1990 in a bold insurrection against Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Activists lit smoke bombs, carrying an effigy of Fauci's head on a stick, brandishing coffins emblazoned with the defiant phrase, "F**K YOU FAUCI."
Fauci stood accused of heinous offenses — deliberately obstructing access to safe, effective, off-patent therapeutic treatments for AIDS, all while shamelessly promoting a pricey and lethal chemotherapy drug that lined the pockets of Big Pharma.
Had Fauci listened to people with AIDS and the clinicians treating them, and responded accordingly, he would have saved thousands of lives. In the two years between 1987, when Callen met with Fauci and 1989, when the guidelines were ultimately issued, nearly 17,000 people with AIDS suffocated from PCP. Most of these people might have lived had Fauci responded appropriately.
Fauci refused to acknowledge the evidence and, according to one account, even encouraged people with AIDS to stop taking treatments, like Bactrim, that weren't specifically approved for use in people with AIDS. Longtime treatment activist Richard Jefferys wrote in 2001 that Fauci "went as far as telling activists attending a 1987 meeting that there was no data to suggest PCP prophylaxis was beneficial and that it may, in fact be dangerous." Fauci's close colleague, Dr. Samuel Broder, who was head of the National Cancer Institute, even suggested -- in the absence of any evidence at all -- that the newly introduced antiretroviral, AZT, would make prophylaxis against PCP redundant!
In his comment to the Blade, Fauci fails to mention how skeptical he was of Bactrim as a preventive treatment, that he questioned the existing science, was unswayed by how frontline clinicians were treating people with AIDS and had suggested stopping a treatment that was already saving lives.
About 5,000 to 6,000 homosexual men were imprisoned in the concentration camps.[133] Sociologist Rüdiger Lautmann examined 2,542 known cases of homosexual concentration camp prisoners and determined their death rate was 60 percent, compared with 42 percent of political prisoners and 35 percent of Jehovah's Witnesses.[56] Assuming a death rate of between 53 and 60 percent, at least 3,100 to 3,600 men died in the camps.[134]
Understandable. Wikipedia is also essentially functions the same in many instances.
Even as a propaganda machine, if you look far enough back, they've been eating their own for decades.
That's all.
The Huffpost piece shows that Fauci ran the same op in the 80's that he ran this time around with familiar consequences, e.g.: slandering a medication that works for medication that was personally profitable to him to the detriment of the people he claims he was 'helping.'
If I posted sources from the 'right', which are already available to everyone, the 'left' can just slander it as 'misinformation' or 'fake news'. If it's posted from one of their "Trusted Sources" they have much less footing to argue with and usually take it as scripture. If I can get them to dispose of their own propaganda rag, that's just an auxiliary 'plus' in the long run.
It probably doesn't work all too well, but that's my rationale.
INSURRECTION🚨 AIDS activists shattered the doors of the National Institute of Health in 1990 in a bold insurrection against Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Activists lit smoke bombs, carrying an effigy of Fauci's head on a stick, brandishing coffins emblazoned with the defiant phrase, "F**K YOU FAUCI."
Fauci stood accused of heinous offenses — deliberately obstructing access to safe, effective, off-patent therapeutic treatments for AIDS, all while shamelessly promoting a pricey and lethal chemotherapy drug that lined the pockets of Big Pharma.
Comparison:
The Huffpost the Rothschilds favorite DS BS Propaganda machine.
Understandable. Wikipedia is also essentially functions the same in many instances.
Even as a propaganda machine, if you look far enough back, they've been eating their own for decades.
That's all.
The Huffpost piece shows that Fauci ran the same op in the 80's that he ran this time around with familiar consequences, e.g.: slandering a medication that works for medication that was personally profitable to him to the detriment of the people he claims he was 'helping.'
If I posted sources from the 'right', which are already available to everyone, the 'left' can just slander it as 'misinformation' or 'fake news'. If it's posted from one of their "Trusted Sources" they have much less footing to argue with and usually take it as scripture. If I can get them to dispose of their own propaganda rag, that's just an auxiliary 'plus' in the long run.
It probably doesn't work all too well, but that's my rationale.
I totally agree, these fact checker web sites were supporting the DS BS as being fact. Great points and reminders. Thank you.