The documents show that Sarah Ransome may not have been the most credible witness. One of them details the inconsistencies between her recorded testimony and the few materials she actually provided (though more were requested). The sensationalist claims re: Trump were made in an email chain to a reporter Ransome wanted to engage in telling her story. At one point in the emails she curses out the reporter (seems the reporter did not do something Ransome wanted her to do); at another point in the chain she says that she wants to ensure neither Clinton nor Trump get elected. Of course the MSM will leave out the questions that surround her story.
I am not saying she is a liar, but she does seem to have a history of manipulating circumstances to her advantage. If Trump was involved, it would have come out years ago.
The documents show that Sarah Ransome may not have been the most credible witness. One of them details the inconsistencies between her recorded testimony and the few materials she actually provided (though more were requested). The sensationalist claims re: Trump were made in an email chain to a reporter Ransome wanted to engage in telling her story. At one point in the emails she curses out the reporter (seems the reporter did not do something Ransome wanted her to do); at another point in the chain she says that she wants to ensure neither Clinton nor Trump get elected. Of course the MSM will leave out the questions that surround her story.
I am not saying she is a liar, but she does seem to have a history of manipulating circumstances to her advantage. If Trump was involved, it would have come out years ago.