By all means head over to conspiracies.win to talk about it. Here at GreatAwakening.win we are about the great awakening, but we're working within the Q posts, as such, and as Q post 2225 points out, "moon landings are real"
Human cargo is a little more perishable than sensors and machinery, so it necessitates a faster trip, even if it requires a bigger rocket to do it faster. If you don't have flesh and blood that you want alive, there and back, taking your time usually results in much less expensive missions.
Limited fuel means slower approach-however, the vibrations of takeoff damaged fuel system-righty-tighty, lefty loosey enters the chat loss of fuel critical..
I found this whole thing fishy.
They blasted off a day or two ago, but said they wouldn't reach the moon until feb. I recall it only took 3 days back in the 60s/70s
Are we allowed to talk now about moon landing hoax in this board without being called retards and banned? Just checking.
Sure, but at conspiracies.win. This is a Q/GA board:
u/#q2225
And GA means Great Awakening…in what empty space in your brain does a possible moon hoax not exactly correlate to GA.
It absolutely does.
By all means head over to conspiracies.win to talk about it. Here at GreatAwakening.win we are about the great awakening, but we're working within the Q posts, as such, and as Q post 2225 points out, "moon landings are real"
True...very fishy.
Human cargo is a little more perishable than sensors and machinery, so it necessitates a faster trip, even if it requires a bigger rocket to do it faster. If you don't have flesh and blood that you want alive, there and back, taking your time usually results in much less expensive missions.
i guess that is a reasonable take to quell some of the fishiness.
Limited fuel means slower approach-however, the vibrations of takeoff damaged fuel system-righty-tighty, lefty loosey enters the chat loss of fuel critical..