The First U.S. Moon Landing Attempt in More Than 50 Years Appears Unsuccessful - hmmmmm appears unsuccessful??? - The Great Awakening

The First U.S. Moon Landing Attempt in More Than 50 Years Appears Unsuccessful - hmmmmm appears unsuccessful??? (share.newsbreak.com)

posted 311 days ago by damnImgood 311 days ago by damnImgood +33 / -1

28 comments

28 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (28)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– Fatality 6 points 311 days ago +8 / -2

I found this whole thing fishy.

They blasted off a day or two ago, but said they wouldn't reach the moon until feb. I recall it only took 3 days back in the 60s/70s

permalink save report block reply

▲ 8 ▼

– UnvaxxedUnafraid 8 points 311 days ago +11 / -3

Are we allowed to talk now about moon landing hoax in this board without being called retards and banned? Just checking.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Fatality 1 point 311 days ago +5 / -4

Sure, but at conspiracies.win. This is a Q/GA board:

u/#q2225

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Prodigalonmyknees 2 points 310 days ago +2 / -0

And GA means Great Awakening…in what empty space in your brain does a possible moon hoax not exactly correlate to GA.

It absolutely does.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– Fatality 0 points 310 days ago +1 / -1

By all means head over to conspiracies.win to talk about it. Here at GreatAwakening.win we are about the great awakening, but we're working within the Q posts, as such, and as Q post 2225 points out, "moon landings are real"

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q