Frazzledrip?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
Receipts or nothing.
This is a quandry... I agree with you... but, by looking are we not then guilty of a host of laws? And, quite frankly I don't know if any of the raw stuff should ever be made public, because too many would be changed for the worse due to the psych trauma.
Maybe we need a number of citizen volunteers willing to view it.
But then again, how do we rid the world of such evil without confronting it? Like I said, a quandry.
a) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) sets each one within free to perceive everything.
b) Ignoring perceivable (laws of nature) for suggested (laws of men) shapes ones ignorance into the host for parasitic exploitation by others.
c) Others suggest guilt and innocence to distract from response-ability (choice). Why does one requires the response ability of choice? To adapt to a balance based system...not to judge the choices by others.
Judging another implies shirking of ones response-ability onto another.
a) Public ignorance establishes the opportunity for private exploitation.
b) There's nothing more private than oneself...consenting to suggested publicism tempts one to ignore self for others, while permitting others private control over public.
c) Raw implies "not altered from its natural state"...Natural order (inception towards death) implies alteration for each one (life) within.
Alter implies "to make different in some particular"...being implies particular within whole, hence different from one another.
d) "don't" aka "doing nothing" implies ones consent to suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing), hence ones denial of everything perceivable (knowledge; to know; to perceive) when consenting to suggested.
a) Psychology aka Psyche (animating power) + Logic (reasoning about suggested)...latter tempts one to ignore former, hence all the trauma.
Reason implies conflict; conflict implies trauma.
b) If children can survive abuse by adults, then adults can survive not ignoring how other adults are abusing children. Ignorance among adults represents the foundation for child abuse.
A pedophile couldn't fuck as many children as an ignorant adult fucks over.
"But I wasn't aware"...neither are children aware of what adults want, so who had more time to change awareness?
a) There can be only one...oneself. Anyone else implies shirking of ones response-ability onto others.
b) Number implies "designation of a unit"...UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one).
c) Whole implies perceivable need; each partial within implies suggested want to one another.
Partial (life) needs to resist whole (inception towards death), while being tempted to want from one another. Want tempts one to ignore need.
tl; dr: Many are guilty of ignorance, which in return tempts few to prey upon innocence.