Yes. She can. But to paraphrase another banger: "Call everything misogynistic until you control it" really fits well.
At this point in this particular process, when someone begins asking for definitions, it's over.
This podcast is an incredibly soft debate where Brian gives them an open forum to hold their ideas up to sunlight to see if they lilt.
The problem for many who come on the show is that Brian is so very calm, mild and understanding (most times). He isn't very mean. He isn't very presumptuous. He'll follow them all the way down to the bottom of their own conclusions with them socratically, carefully, to the point where they're basically answering their own questions.
So if they're calling him names, who else would stand a chance? Who would believe her accusations after watching the exchange? It's transparent.
Said another way: she's basically on the verge of tears, for what? She called him a misogynist, he wasn't being one: everyone saw the maneuver where she made herself a fake victim of supposed misogyny in front of millions of people.
It would be like if I walked up to you, you did nothing, but I called the cops to say you hit me, all in front of the jury members who would be deliberating on the situation.
She fucked up, not just for her, but for a lot of women who do this, and she knows it.
That's why she left. It wasn't that she couldn't explain the word itself, it's that she already tipped her hand, giving away the game she was trying to play on him.
Yes. She can. But to paraphrase another banger: "Call everything misogynistic until you control it" really fits well.
At this point in this particular process, when someone begins asking for definitions, it's over.
This podcast is an incredibly soft debate where Brian gives them an open forum to hold their ideas up to sunlight to see if they lilt.
The problem for many who come on the show is that Brian is so very calm, mild and understanding (most times). He isn't very mean. He isn't very presumptuous. He'll follow them all the way down to the bottom of their own conclusions with them socratically, carefully, to the point where they're basically answering their own questions.
So if they're calling him names, who else would stand a chance? Who would believe her accusations after watching the exchange? It's transparent.
Said another way: she's basically on the verge of tears, for what? She called him a misogynist, he wasn't being one: everyone saw the maneuver where she made herself a fake victim of supposed misogyny in front of millions of people.
It would be like if I walked up to you, you did nothing, but I called the cops to say you hit me, all in front of the jury members who would be deliberating on the situation.
She fucked up, not just for her, but for a lot of women who do this, and she knows it.
That's why she left. It wasn't that she couldn't explain the word itself, it's that she already tipped her hand, giving away the game she was trying to play on him.