Unfortunately we find ourselves in a situation where a RhoGam injection is probably necessary considering the blood types of mother/baby (still haven’t found out yet but had to last time)… considering the vaxxed blood in donations now and that RhoGam is made through a collection of donors… is there any way around this?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (3)
sorted by:
It supposedly only a problem if the baby gets cut during birth and mixes with mother's blood. I had homebirths with my babies. I'm negative and my husband is positive. No rhogam shots for me, and everyone is fine. So, it is possible to forgo them, although "against your doctor's orders."
Not only do rhogam shots contain blood products from donors who most likely aren't screened for C-19 shots, but also contain mercury. I had a (chiropractor) patient who did NOT vax her 4 children. Yet, the 1st died of "SIDS", the 2nd was deaf and blind and severely retarded, the 3rd and 4th were autistic. She had them tested by a naturopath (hair and blood samples), and they tested sky high in mercury/ thimerosal. She didn't understand how this happened, until I asked her if she received rhogam shots while pregnant. Yes, she had. These babies were assaulted multiple times in the womb and through breastfeeding with higher levels of mercury than baby vaccines. Rhogam shots are almost 50% mercury by weight!!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705731/
Look under heading " Conflicts of Interest in Mercury Exposure and Autism Research."
It has been years since I read a particular journal article, so I can't point you to it now, but it said rhogam shots had 20 times the amount if mercury than a flu shot.
You're in a tough spot. I chose NO WAY, and had no fear, and was comfortable with my choices, and everything turned out OK. Hopefully, other pedes can chime in with info for you to make an informed choice either way.