a point you could make,

isnt it weird how every single study that finds that vaccines are safe and effective is automatically considered to be a good study, beyond reproach, beyond scrutiny, beyond question,

and yet every single study that finds any kind of problem with any vaccine is automatically considered to be a bad study, and “debunked” by any means necessary.

Prove me wrong, by showing me a good study, that finds a vaccine problem,

Or show me a bad study, that finds vaccines are safe and effective.

At this point, the canon of literature suggests vaccines are 100% safe and effective,

So obviously any study that was to go against the scientific consensus, must be a bad study, so they nit-pick and find any kind of supposed flaw within the study,

And you say to them,

This is amazing how you have selective critical thinking!

Let me demonstrate what i mean by asking you to scrutinize this here study that was done by CDC (Thompson, et al)

And what you will do instead, is defer to someone elses opinion about Thompson et al, instead of actually critically analizing the study for themselves,

Because they seem to know, that once they start to indentify any kind of weakness in the study, it brings the result of the study into question,

But worse than that…

It brings their entire belief system into question.

And it brings into question their vaccine dogma.

And slowly as the facade of vaccine science is lifted,

All of their wreched lies are being exposed.

You cant tell people,

You have to show them.

Shout out to Missouri, “The Show Me State”