Q on Emotional Pushes
Q1988
See how FAKE NEWS works?
See how CLICKBAIT works?
See how EMOTIONAL PUSHES TO TARGETED READERS works?
Q
If you search the Q drops for the word "emotional' you will find several instances where Q elaborates on how emotional responses are used to manipulate people in a number of different ways.
This points to fact that it is important for truth warriors, anons, Q patriots and researchers, to a) be aware of how their own emotions may be being used or targeted and also b) to observe clearly when others are using emotional pushes to manipulate people and to critically evaluate the purpose and intention behind certain narratives.
Dom Lucre's Tunnel Investigation
Dom Lucre has built a big following on X (1 million followers) and has now dubbed himself "The breaker of narratives".
On January 31, he released a "Tunnel Investigation" short film (https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363).
🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Every year, over 1,000 children go missing in the State of New York, and many are never found. New York is ranked 5th in the nation in child abductions. The State also has one of the most extensive tunnel systems in the country, with almost 1,000 tunnels reaching across the entire state. Many are secret.
On January 8th, 2024, clashes broke out at the World Headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch Synagogue in Brooklyn New York- known as the “770”.
Footage leaking from the clash revealed that there were secret tunnels dug beneath the synagogue, and millions witnessed the extremely alarming images coming from the videos: a book covered in blood, a child’s highchair, and a soiled mattress.
With reports of widespread cases of child sex abuse occurring within the Chabad; theories began to spread about the true purpose of these tunnels.
Last week, in partnership with Truth Army Films, I went to New York to investigate not only the Chabad Tunnels, but also the underground network of tunnels that run underneath the entire state of New York.
Now, we are releasing our findings to the world.
Watch ‘The Tunnels’ FULL documentary HERE:
Time Stamps:
2:40 - The Unsealed Chabad Tunnel
5:19 - Symbolism in tipped off tunnel
12:53 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Enters The 770 Chabad Synagogue
6:17 - Child Sex Abuse Victim of The Chabad Synagogue
18:26 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Films Get Kicked out The 770 Chabad
22:19 - Dom Lucre speaks to the New York locals About Child Trafficking
26:42 - Final Tunnel/Closing
But in this film, there is a rather problematic section starting at 6:17.
https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363
Jordan Sather comments:
But for 6 minutes of this film, Dom Lucre "interviews" an Australian man named Manny Waks who gives testimony of child abuse he received when part of an ultra-orthodox synagogue.
Problem is - DOM LUCE DIDN'T INTERVIEW HIM.
Dom and his production team took Waks video and fabricated a set to make it look like Waks was talking to Dom. Manny Waks is disgusted how his testimony was used in this film. He had never heard of Dom Lucre before. How disgusting to make this man's vulnerable testimony and slap it into this shoddy production.
Dom has a history of stealing content and acting like it's his own.
This whole film appears to be a massive money and clickbait grift. Who cares about the truth when you want to be popular, right Dom Lucrative? Engagement is all that matters!
(https://t.me/jordansather/9898)
Waks himself responded to the Dom Lucre film this way:
A shoddy and outrageous piece of “journalism”…for the record, I’m completely distancing myself from Dom’s nonsense. I didn’t give him an interview and I’m appalled that he’s using this unrelated interview for his conspiracy theory.
https://twitter.com/mannywaks/status/1753114223159500813
As someone else tweeted:
@dom_lucre you got som'splainin' to do
@trutharmyfilms you said it was a real interview.... You want to explain yourself now?
Lessons and takeaways
We are living in the midst of a psy-war. In the psy-war, everything revolves around information - true information, fake information, distorted information, information used for purposes as varying as exploitation, manipulation, control and liberation.
One wonders why Lucre and his film team were so willing to insert a section of information that presents a very false impression. Notice how the time in the section is spent focusing on Lucre himself. Apart from creating the impression that he is interviewing Waks, it also makes Lucre himself a feature and aspect of the film.
Why? We expect this sort of behavior from MSM hacks like 60 minutes, but if Dom is truly about exposing truth, then why this?
It's hard to not wonder if Lucre is more interested in his own agenda than the actual truth agenda. He could have easily set the content up in a manner that does NOT create the illusion that he is interviewing the man. Why didn't he?
Perhaps because the interview content has nothing whatsoever to do with New York, or even the USA.
Again, Sather posts:
Manny Waks isn't even from New York, his testimony is related to events that happened in Melbourne, Australia.
How is it relevant to throw his video into this documentary about tunnels in New York?
Plus, nearly every large metropolis has tunnel systems underneath it. And the whole recent Chabad tunnel fiasco in New York didn't have child trafficking going on.
Human trafficking = necessary to expose, but not in shoddy, clickbait ways like this.
Dom is acting like he's doing so much to "expose human trafficking" - when in reality... he's not doing that much. Just fabricating empty conspiracies for popularity. Nasty grift from a lazy "reporter"
https://t.me/jordansather/9900
For me, this situation highlights what to me is an important realization:
The landscape of the narrative war, the psywar, is not simply black and white, or up and down, as if there are only TWO monolithic factions vying for supremacy.
In addition to deep state / Cabal operations that are attempting to perpetuate and defend the Cabal control on the narratives, there are also myriad other actors whose agenda may neither be to support the DS or fight against them. Think opportunistic black marketeers who exploit the chaos and vulnerabilities generated by war.
Moreover, even among the exploiters, some of these will merely be self-interested opportunists, but others may also be Cabal disinfo operations disguised as self-interested grifters, etc. It's important to realize this and keep one's sense of skepticism alive.
Whether you conclude that Lucre is a grifting 'lazy reporter', or someone caught up in his own hype, or a truth warrior who screwed up here, the real point is to pay attention to who you listen to and ALWAYS apply your own critical thinking to the information that comes across your screen, and question your OWN conclusions.
Such a practice is key to the goals of the Q operation.
Q2816
The DECLASSIFICATION of all requested documents (+ more) will occur. This is not a game.
Do not let personal (emotional) desires ("do it now""now""what is taking so long""NOW!") take over.
Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied.
Game-Theory.
I appreciate the deep dive on this guy. I had him pegged as a "paytriot" - someone trying to cash in with clicks and massive social media fame on the populist movement. For me, it was less based on his content, but on the way his content suddenly started appearing on populist/MAGA forums and social media outlets all over the place in what looked to be an inorganic way. He'd post something, and immediately, it'd be all over forums like these and making the rounds through the "retweet" circuits. When that regularly happens, it looks like what the Left does with NYT, WashPo, and certain "experts say." Someone's trying to broadcast their message. I've seen this kind of thing out of "conservative" commentators and it turns out they're using anonymity or fake accounts to boost their own content and make themselves look like a bigger deal than they actually are. Dom started showing up here, regularly boosted to the top of the "hot" list, and often stickied. That's when I started being skeptical.
I tend to be a very logic-driven person when evaluating this kind of thing. When I went through grad school, they drilled us hard on evaluating the source of various information to assess biases. And with "news," it has now fused with entertainment. Social media personalities act like celebrities trying to create cults of personality, build "brands," market themselves, and most importantly, get filthy rich doing it. This kind of thing is very, very lucrative (Lucre wasn't chosen by accident, as a handle, I suspect. It means wealth).
As others have said, you can disregard all of that "assess the source" and simply evaluate the content on its own merit. There's value in that. But, it also opens you up to confirmation bias. People post what you want to hear. You read it, and it conforms to how you see the world, so you accept it even if it's BS. This guy seems to prey on doing stuff like this. So, we do have to assess credibility. We should know that clearly by now. Everyone who's ever come out to make claims against Trump, once we find out their backgrounds, has a list of red flags a mile long - see E. Jean Carroll as the most recent example. The lady's a sex-craved lunatic with a penchant for rape fantasies, and lying about her sexual history. You can't just take her word without assessing the source.
TDLR: I'm not on the Dom Lucre money train.
Well-stated and very important considerations to bear in mind always.
Just as when one writes (or speaks) they need to consider their audience, they’re doing so in order to convey information and/or theories-concepts in the most effective way possible. The beasts also consider their audience and do the same, but effectiveness to them is deceit and manipulation and usually for nefarious purposes. So it’s imperative to research the authors/speakers background in an attempt to determine if they have an ulterior motive.
Beyond that, finding out what conflicts of interest may affect what’s being relayed to the public will have another impact on the validity of the information being presented. “Experts say”, as you cite, is one example of this. “A sizable majority of people polled say” is another example when considering that beasts carefully choose the particular people to poll to get their desired outcome, use it as adding weight to their claims with “official sounding” ‘data’ (sic) to back it up.
Your perception regarding behavior is also important, perhaps more difficult for many to grasp. I feel that a lot of (though not all) anons are more naturally attuned to noticing these types of changes and trying to understand what they arise from. I think even during the infancy of the plandemic, for example, many people had heightened awareness that something was very amiss, that there was some sort of nefarious ulterior motive in play. Intuition. Ignore it at your peril.