Jury nullificication is the final tool in the toolbox. If you are on a jury, and you don’t like the law, or think its being applied inappropriately, you can just vote to acquit, regardless of the facts in the case.

They don’t like us talking about jury nullification, and if you protest outside a courthouse with a sign that says “jury nullification”, they will try to have you arresed for tampering with a jury.

So its best to pretend like you don’t know about jury nullification, and just do what you gotta do when the time comes.

However most cases you would ever hear jury nullifiation wouldnt apply, because you actually do agree with the law, the law is being applied correctly, and the facts in the case are clear and unambiguous.

Im gonna ask ChatGPT about jury nullification and see what they have to say brb…

ChatGPT: Jury nullification refers to when a jury acquits a defendant despite the evidence and the law supporting a conviction. It occurs when jurors believe that a law is unjust or wrongly applied to the case at hand. While controversial, it's within the power of a jury to nullify a law, although judges often discourage or prevent discussions of nullification during trials.

Actually almost 200 years ago. enter text