Trump should personally sue the judge in a federal court. In that case, the judge has to pay for his own defense, and New York is forbidden to immunize him or pay for defense. In particular, the allegations should include that the judge committed acts out of scope.
Government actors get government defense when sued in their official capacity. They don't if they are sued privately for crimes (acting out of scope).
Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution.
I'm sure there is a whole list of violations, including the major one of failing to accurately appraise the value of Mar a Lago, The Winter White House, then using it to cause the defendant to lose. Violation of due process.
Trump should personally sue the judge in a federal court. In that case, the judge has to pay for his own defense, and New York is forbidden to immunize him or pay for defense. In particular, the allegations should include that the judge committed acts out of scope.
Where do you get this from?
Government actors get government defense when sued in their official capacity. They don't if they are sued privately for crimes (acting out of scope).
Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution.
OK. What exactly would be the basis for such a lawsuit?
Like realistically? Trump's already spent a chunk of change on lawsuits that got tossed out of court.
I'm sure there is a whole list of violations, including the major one of failing to accurately appraise the value of Mar a Lago, The Winter White House, then using it to cause the defendant to lose. Violation of due process.