2
Archon69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why were there US sanctions on Hungary, a country whose president came to speak at CPAC?

2
Archon69 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the Muslim children do not understand German and are in a classroom with German-speaking children, what language is the teacher speaking and how is anyone learning anything?๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜น

2
Archon69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could we have webcams, even behind a paywall, in case any wetbacks don't know about the alligators and try to swim free?๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ

1
Archon69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mr. Dog sir, sorry, but your archive link still has the paywall as a graphic at the bottom that says:

Keep reading with a 7 day free trial

๐Ÿ˜น๐Ÿ˜น๐Ÿ˜น๐Ÿ˜น๐Ÿ˜น

Maybe we didn't have any comments here because no one could read the article?๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚

1
Archon69 1 point ago +2 / -1

The police have an obligation to protect the public, but no obligation to protect any individual or group. You are on your own, unless you and like-minded people take care of yourselves.

4
Archon69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Natural born citizenship means citizenship obviously derived from the facts of the birth with no complexities or foreign countries involved.

To be a natural born citizen requires all 3 of the below:

1 American father

2 American mother

3 birth in America

Natural born citizenship is a special kind of citizenship that only relates to eligibility to be president and VP. It has nothing to with whether one is simply a citizen who can live, work, and spend their life in the USA.

1
Archon69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we should model American citizenship laws on those of the Gulf countries.

2
Archon69 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a paywall blocking the 2nd paragraph until the end. Does anyone have the rest of the article?

20
Archon69 20 points ago +20 / -0

How can green card holders give citizenship to their babies, when they themselves are not citizens?

1
Archon69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I asked Brave's search engine and their AI replied:

Who Supervises Federal Judges?

Federal judges are supervised through a combination of administrative and judicial oversight mechanisms. The Judicial Councils and the Judicial Conference are responsible for overseeing the conduct of federal judges, including investigating and addressing misconduct. However, these bodies can only investigate sitting judges, as outlined in 28 U.S.C. ยง 351(d)(1), which includes circuit judges, district judges, bankruptcy judges, or magistrate judges.

Additionally, the Department of Justice plays a significant role in the administrative oversight of the federal judiciary, including the issuance of judicial commissions and maintaining records of judicial appointments.

Federal judges may also be held accountable through the impeachment process, where the House of Representatives can impeach a judge, and the Senate can convict and remove them from office.

1
Archon69 1 point ago +1 / -0

For anyone unaware about the meaning of 'illegal aliens', it means wetbacks.๐Ÿ˜‚

1
Archon69 1 point ago +1 / -0

In simpler terms, wouldn't it be embarrassing for this judge if someone were to go to the Supreme Court and ask them to look at this judge's defiance of a Supreme Court order and to correct the defiance?

Mandamus is a judicial remedy in the English and American common law system consisting of a court order that commands a government official or entity to perform an act it is legally required to perform as part of its official duties, or to refrain from performing an act the law forbids it from doing. A writ of mandamus is an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion.

An interlocutory appeal (or interim appeal) occurs when a ruling by a trial court is appealed while other aspects of the case are still proceeding.

If a court makes a stupid ruling on one issue, but the case is not finished, this is basically a request to a higher court to fix the error.

2
Archon69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump is acting like he is dealing with 2 red-headed step-children that are have a little fight.๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚

2
Archon69 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought she moved away to Ireland after President Trump became President #47.

3
Archon69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can a state put tolls on federal highways built for interstate commerce, all without the federal government giving some kind of consent?

I put this into https://search.brave.com and AI gave an answer:

State Tolls on Federal Highways

In general, states cannot impose tolls on federal highways built for interstate commerce without federal consent due to long-standing legal restrictions. Federal law, specifically 23 U.S.C. ยง 301, prohibits tolls on highways constructed with federal funds to ensure they remain free for interstate commerce.

This restriction has been in place in various forms for over 80 years and applies broadly to the Interstate Highway System, which was largely financed by federal aid.

However, there are exceptions. States may toll roads that were not built with federal funds or were incorporated into the Interstate System before 1956 and were originally toll facilities. Additionally, Congress has allowed certain tolling arrangements under specific conditions, such as the reconstruction or replacement of toll-free bridges or tunnels.

A notable example of federal oversight occurred in Rhode Island, where a federal judge ruled that the stateโ€™s truck tolls on interstate bridges were unconstitutional because they violated the federal prohibition on tolls for roads built with federal funds.

This underscores the importance of federal consent and compliance with existing laws when considering tolling on federal highways.

In summary, while states have some flexibility in tolling non-federally funded roads, tolling on federally funded highways generally requires federal approval and must adhere to statutory exceptions and constitutional principles such as the Commerce Clause.

view more: Next ›