When an article trashes a LLM you can be sure its a hit piece. Why is this? Because LLMs are language models, which means they dont "think" they simply complete an answer based on all the text they have been trained on.
But why would the mainstream want to smear these LLMs? Because LLMs are easily accessible. There are tons of LLMs developed by individuals and most of them are free. Many of them can run on typical computers, even without specialised GPUs, and if you want to run them on GPUs they are also accessible to normal users, a bit expensive, but accessible.
LLMs can be incredibly useful as a tool to help with whatever you want to do. You can feed it documents and ask questiosn about them. You can use them to write code, write emails, enhance productivity or even have entertainment.
One thing LLMs cannot do? Start wars. Because they are simply language models.
When an article trashes a LLM you can be sure its a hit piece. Why is this? Because LLMs are language models, which means they dont "think" they simply complete an answer based on all the text they have been trained on.
But why would the mainstream want to smear these LLMs? Because LLMs are easily accessible. There are tons of LLMs developed by individuals and most of them are free. Many of them can run on typical computers, even without specialised GPUs, and if you want to run them on GPUs they are also accessible to normal users, a bit expensive, but accessible.
LLMs can be incredibly useful as a tool to help with whatever you want to do. You can feed it documents and ask questiosn about them. You can use them to write code, write emails, enhance productivity or even have entertainment.
One thing LLMs cannot do? Start wars. Because they are simply language models.
Interesting... Thanks for the info fren BB... I learned something new today... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️