The PCR test is not a diagnostic test. They ran it at 40 cycles causing g 95 percent t false positive which means 100 percent false positive. My wife is a medical scientist and she has the manual at our house. She has pointed this out over and over. Theybway they used it was wrong and the results a total fabrication. There is no virus beyond that it tested for they are keeping that in their back pocket to use it again for the next made up bullshit.
I've tried to ask people what they think the PCR tests is doing and I'm met with blank stares. No logical reasoning skills to question any of what they're told.
The PCR test is not a diagnostic test. They ran it at 40 cycles causing g 95 percent t false positive which means 100 percent false positive. My wife is a medical scientist and she has the manual at our house. She has pointed this out over and over. Theybway they used it was wrong and the results a total fabrication. There is no virus beyond that it tested for they are keeping that in their back pocket to use it again for the next made up bullshit.
I've tried to ask people what they think the PCR tests is doing and I'm met with blank stares. No logical reasoning skills to question any of what they're told.
It gave positive results for goats blood, quail blood and papaya.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6910821/coronavirus-papaya-goat-tanzania/
And the president who mocked the vax and PCR testing companies as being frauds was dead the following year.
And the inventor of PCR who said don't use my invention to test for viruses was dead a couple of months before 'the virus'.
Absolutely correct. The test is common for a completely different use.