In this case a news organization who receives some funding from the WEF published an article about democrat operatives who point out that electors could refuse to certify Trump's win.
Saying that the WEF ordered it is a bit of a stretch.
If it was one of hundreds of orgs that Putin provides some funding to, and they were quoting someone else in their reporting that felt the a deep state may have been involved, then yes it's a comparable stretch. Well that was fun.
Orders? I'd call that election interference. Time to crush the wef one member at a time. Thos shit can and will work both ways.
"orders" is a strong word.
In this case a news organization who receives some funding from the WEF published an article about democrat operatives who point out that electors could refuse to certify Trump's win.
Saying that the WEF ordered it is a bit of a stretch.
Like saying Putin published 2000 pages of how Deep State made / caused Covid is a stretch?
If it was one of hundreds of orgs that Putin provides some funding to, and they were quoting someone else in their reporting that felt the a deep state may have been involved, then yes it's a comparable stretch. Well that was fun.
You mean like these "charities"?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/islPcAOV1R6Y/
How much money can we seize from them?