2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Close, but I think she's pointing out how there was outrage from the right about her storing classified emails on a private server in her home, but silence about Trump storing classified files in his home

-3
Buttery -3 points ago +3 / -6

But it was April 10th 2018

So Donald J Rrump?

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

You really should look at how fentanyl addiction takes hold of people; they're not all stereotypical drug addicts. Victim-blaming doesn't help anyone.

9
Buttery 9 points ago +10 / -1

There's also the fact that the RNC is currently paying his legal bills, and can't continue to do so if he officially announces his candidacy.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +3 / -1

You can see the how people have viewed him here by searching his name https://greatawakening.win/search?params=gregg&community=GreatAwakening

If you would like to see how he's viewed outside this space, there is a wikipedia entry showing where his name has come up in the past, worth looking at the receipts before dismissing them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregg_Phillips

I know him best as the guy who said that 3-5 million illegal immigrants voted in California in 2016, which Trump quoted, but evidence was never provided.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +2 / -1

pressured or paid to not release all the real truth

Is this just based on you feeling let down?

7
Buttery 7 points ago +8 / -1

Where in the article does it actually show the Rothschilds confirming it?

I would have liked to have seen how the "two weeks of research" was conducted. Could provide good tools for other researchers.

Edit: I thought this referred to the source for the image it was next to, but seems to be the "source" for the entire article. This is just embarrassing.

NO SOURCE: Social Media

1
Buttery 1 point ago +2 / -1

Woops, geography fail. Guess that explains the downvotes.

-5
Buttery -5 points ago +2 / -7

He invests in something he believes in.. and Netherlands plan to reduce livestock numbers?

The first two are very closely tied together, what does the action of a Scandinavian country with a population of 17 million have to do with it?

1
Buttery 1 point ago +2 / -1

Like what knight of sunset said, the teams will pounce on anything, like I really wonder if DJT ok'ed the use of Ivana's death for fundraising emails.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +2 / -1

Also the age groups. If the elderly are much more likely to be vaxxed, and much more likely to die from it.. well, is it news that old vulnerable people are dying and the young aren't?

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are other celebrities who weren't on the list saying those kinds of things?

0
Buttery 0 points ago +2 / -2

But did he say anything after the convictions per the tweet this post is about? Other than wishing Ghislaine Maxwell well.

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

Was it really disproven? Or did the Ohio AG just say that he wasn't aware of it?

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

After seeing some random social media post about someone's feelings?

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

Was sad watching GPB suck up to Trump and get snubbed repeatedly.

-1
Buttery -1 points ago +1 / -2

My prediction is a little more status quo than yours, which other than a few lines was basically business as usual.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably a controlled leak to set expectations.

If asked, he would not have confirmed that particular statement, the sources said.

Even covered their asses in advance.

I'm disappointed that they didn't ask regardless.

Edit: I somehow forgot to say it, thanks for following up with details!

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did you read that? Have details of the deposition been leaked? I've only seen vague details that were released by the committee.

9
Buttery 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's worth noting that the committee didn't even recognize the "executive privilege", so all this did was avoid having to wait for a court to decide whether or not he would have to testify. Though the contempt trial is still scheduled to take place.

So one might see it as making a show of "allowing" Bannon to be deposed because they knew there was a good chance they would lose the court case.

Still shows some confidence either way.

My prediction is that it's a delay tactic where Bannon will make demands for the deposition (for example, only on live tv, nothing behind closed doors) which will be refused, and then they'll have to take up in court at an even later date after all.

view more: Next ›