Republicans are going to vote republican regardless of how they feel about them. And if they truly want them to win, they'll say nice things about them (after they become the presumptive nominee).
Liz and Adam might be the exceptions.
Edit: same is true for Dems as well of course. Hell just look at Bernie supporting HRC.
- Are you surprised there was a news crew outside the Trump trial?
- It makes sense that he would self immolate where a news crew is located. If he had done this outside a library in the suburbs would he have gotten the attention he wanted?
I didn't see anything about Smartmatic paying. Just details about OAN previously apologizing to the Dominion exec Coomer and stating that there was no election fraud in Georgia. Both because of lawsuits that were settled.
I think it has to do with the cost of processing the person. The cost of everyone involved with arresting them, paperwork, prosecution, a trial, potentially putting them in jail, etc etc. Really expensive for a box-set of dvds.
They coordinated their tweets obviously. This isn't a lot of individual "coincidences", but one coincidence that they would do this twitter campaign the day before Q dropped this FISA post 4 years ago.
144 other Q drops mentioning FISA, though I didn't parse through them all to see if any others were as interesting.
Tell them to listen to this and give you the tl;dl
Found via a simple search for qanon "sealed indictments". They actually get to the subject around the 33 minute mark (or so it seemed from fast forwarding through)
Edit: FYI u/Meme_war_ii_vet as I realize my post may have been too late for you to see it as well
I often find myself asking the same question: "What does this prove?"
The feedback I usually get is that "Q causes specific times to be reported or to happen as a way to tell anons that whitehats are still in control". For example having the Queen Elizabeth's casket lowered at a specific time. But of course with so many world events and mico world events, of course some timestamp is going to line up, right?
Good writeup.
I wish those MSM clips were date-stamped so we can see how much they've aged.
MTG talks a lot about what Johnson should have done, but I'd like to hear her say that she would be ok with a government shutdown in order to not make teh compromises that he did.
Was surprised to hear Tucker slip in a pro-Gaza comment too!
Would you try convincing someone that far gone and/or made of straw? Immigration is such an easy win that there's no need to cherry pick data. I feel that an argument presenting the entire picture and giving the other side no wiggle room is the more effective one.
If someone is genuinely concerned about the border then they should be made aware of what's happened there
They'll probably point to what isn't on the graphic, eg COVID-19, the number of expulsions (5x higher for Biden), etc
People seemed to think that they'd have a better shot with Biden elected and the number of attempted immigrants soared, especially from atypical countries. Rolling back all those Trump laws (except title 42 of course) really didn't help and that's how we have the clusterf*ck still to this day.
Anyway, it's more complicated and there's more context than one graphic can provide is what they'd say.
I guess we differ on our definitions of "red pills"
used to refer to a process by which a person's perspective is dramatically transformed, introducing them to a new and typically disturbing understanding of the true nature of a particular situation.
I don't feel like hearing someone say "Trump is going to stop corruption" in conversation can accomplish this.
If your definition of a red pill is less intense then yeah red pills abound.
My username is in reference to popcorn.
I was surprised to see it on the NYPost. At least the top comment here is pointing out how it's not fraud, even if it's still pivoting to another theory without any evidence.
This comment should be stickied even if a bit harsh.
18 months is a long time..