Why the fuck is any state device using ANY social media?

They're not. This is just red meat to the base to drum up support and generate headlines like the one for this post, which doesn't even mention that it's only for state-owned devices. Big yawn.

Why should people be familiar with it if it's essentially trash?

Why doesn't it dismiss itself to you?

You're basing these things on feelings. All lawfags agree this is a waste of time, put down the hopium.

Lost me at "3033 seconds", way too much effort on that one to make something out of nothing.

suffered painful consequences

aka lost Twitter follows oh the humanity

Three day old tweet, and in that time still lots of love for Musk here

Is this going into ascended masters territory? shudder

Will the red pills be taken seriously when coming from someone labeled this way by DJT?

Good stuff, to me that's enough to disqualify the image until a source is provided.

However there are some pieces that fit, like 2.5 mill to McConnell's senate leadership fund. But that is a separate conversation that shouldn't drag in uninvolved people.

I agree with you, as I have when people post that "I don't need to supply a source because I've done so much research" Homer Simpsons meme.

There should be some modicum of effort put into finding out whether a random screenshot with a bunch of names is legitimate.

Have you looked into the accounts pictured? It's a strong claim you made that can be proven or disproven by checking them out (the ones I checked were real)

So you think it's ok that he's being censored for "being a dick"?

Then do some research, like at opensecrets as I pointed to above.

IMDB is a website that shows information about movies and TV shows. For the latter it shows the name of each episode. I'm as interested in debating their data as I would be about allmusic.com's track listing for a Rolling Stones album.

For the rest, I'm over it, have a good one.

Do you think IMDB would make up a random title for a random tv show to discredit the relationship between these two?

I remembered the incident vaguely and took 10 seconds to research it when challenged. If you want more I'll leave it to you, but it doesn't sound like it would change your mind anyway. I just thought it would be worthwhile for people to know what kind of person they're dealing with when it comes to Fuentes, who may love Trump now, but could be as fickle as the wind.

Try opensecrets.

https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/detail/2022?cmte=C00571703&tab=donors

Here's the 2.5 mill to the senate leadership fund. #20 Ftx Digital Markets

Fuentes

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12545284/

I think they liked the idea of him sapping the black vote from Biden in 2016. This year not so much.

It's an intentional protest, see https://twitter.com/ZackBornstein/status/1596681739157786625

How did this one escape u/purkiss for so long?!

Didn't he call Trump a cuck?

Please do check bc I recall it being only for specific healthcare plans, and only from certain providers -- for low income folks ??

Are you speaking from experience? Do you know Someone who feels this way? I was under the impression that the Trump EO only took effect in specific circumstances and hadn't been even been implemented.

Thanks for that.

So one arm of their charitable organization listed it as one of 38 project ideas which lead to GWP saying that they were funding biological weapons shelters.

Couldn't David Icke say the same thing about the lizard people losing their battle because his forum is still up?

I hear ya, I've got "soon"-fatigue. For fun do a search in the sidebar for terms like "soon", "almost", "precipice" and go back 1-2 years.

Clearly he was never on Voat, people were absolutely convinced we'd be in FEMA camps if Biden entered the white house