2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why the fuck is any state device using ANY social media?

They're not. This is just red meat to the base to drum up support and generate headlines like the one for this post, which doesn't even mention that it's only for state-owned devices. Big yawn.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why should people be familiar with it if it's essentially trash?

Why doesn't it dismiss itself to you?

You're basing these things on feelings. All lawfags agree this is a waste of time, put down the hopium.

5
Buttery 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lost me at "3033 seconds", way too much effort on that one to make something out of nothing.

13
Buttery 13 points ago +16 / -3

Is this going into ascended masters territory? shudder

1
Buttery 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will the red pills be taken seriously when coming from someone labeled this way by DJT?

1
Buttery 1 point ago +3 / -2

Good stuff, to me that's enough to disqualify the image until a source is provided.

However there are some pieces that fit, like 2.5 mill to McConnell's senate leadership fund. But that is a separate conversation that shouldn't drag in uninvolved people.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +3 / -2

I agree with you, as I have when people post that "I don't need to supply a source because I've done so much research" Homer Simpsons meme.

There should be some modicum of effort put into finding out whether a random screenshot with a bunch of names is legitimate.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you looked into the accounts pictured? It's a strong claim you made that can be proven or disproven by checking them out (the ones I checked were real)

So you think it's ok that he's being censored for "being a dick"?

1
Buttery 1 point ago +1 / -0

IMDB is a website that shows information about movies and TV shows. For the latter it shows the name of each episode. I'm as interested in debating their data as I would be about allmusic.com's track listing for a Rolling Stones album.

For the rest, I'm over it, have a good one.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think IMDB would make up a random title for a random tv show to discredit the relationship between these two?

I remembered the incident vaguely and took 10 seconds to research it when challenged. If you want more I'll leave it to you, but it doesn't sound like it would change your mind anyway. I just thought it would be worthwhile for people to know what kind of person they're dealing with when it comes to Fuentes, who may love Trump now, but could be as fickle as the wind.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they liked the idea of him sapping the black vote from Biden in 2016. This year not so much.

3
Buttery 3 points ago +3 / -0

How did this one escape u/purkiss for so long?!

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

Please do check bc I recall it being only for specific healthcare plans, and only from certain providers -- for low income folks ??

0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you speaking from experience? Do you know Someone who feels this way? I was under the impression that the Trump EO only took effect in specific circumstances and hadn't been even been implemented.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for that.

So one arm of their charitable organization listed it as one of 38 project ideas which lead to GWP saying that they were funding biological weapons shelters.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couldn't David Icke say the same thing about the lizard people losing their battle because his forum is still up?

3
Buttery 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hear ya, I've got "soon"-fatigue. For fun do a search in the sidebar for terms like "soon", "almost", "precipice" and go back 1-2 years.

3
Buttery 3 points ago +4 / -1

Clearly he was never on Voat, people were absolutely convinced we'd be in FEMA camps if Biden entered the white house

view more: Next ›