This seems incredibly fishy. The idea is to trust that some billionaire tech owner is going to have an AI that he owns to summarize documents and not expect him to just pick out the things that serve his interest?
Have you not seen what Elon has done since he's bought Twitter?
Have you been living under a rock?
Elon has been un-censoring all kinds of important truths. And his A.I. 'Grok' has been giving out excellent responses to questions asked. In fact, it seems to be the only one of those available that isn't ridiculously biased and propagandized. The rest are completely in the bag for the Lying Left, right down to completely falsifying history and censoring real facts.
Grok is based and not at all agenda-driven. At least, so far.
The only thing 'Fishy' here is expecting our Congress to sign a 5,000-pg. document they haven't read at all.
This seems incredibly fishy. The idea is to trust that some billionaire tech owner is going to have an AI that he owns to summarize documents and not expect him to just pick out the things that serve his interest?
Have you not seen what Elon has done since he's bought Twitter?
Have you been living under a rock?
Elon has been un-censoring all kinds of important truths. And his A.I. 'Grok' has been giving out excellent responses to questions asked. In fact, it seems to be the only one of those available that isn't ridiculously biased and propagandized. The rest are completely in the bag for the Lying Left, right down to completely falsifying history and censoring real facts.
Grok is based and not at all agenda-driven. At least, so far.
The only thing 'Fishy' here is expecting our Congress to sign a 5,000-pg. document they haven't read at all.
He is also in favor of censoring other ideas. There have been people banned from his platform for being overtly critical.
Sorry, but I won't blindly trust an AI owned by a billionaire. He certainly can have his own motives wth the programming of his AI