There's a story out that that grabbed my attention because it was shared with me no less than three times by three people who each had their own "take" on what may be going on. And before we dive into that story, you should know something: I had difficulty figuring out whether to file this story under "Nazi International" or "UFO", and chose the latter, but not because of any strong leaning toward one or another of the interpretive alternatives, but rather because this coming Wednesday's blog will definitely be filed under the former.
So with that said, you may have missed this story about drones "swarming" Langley Air Force Base in December of last year:
Mysterious Drones Swarmed Langley AFB For Weeks
Here's the story in a nutshell, from the first four paragraphs::
Langley Air Force Base, located in one of the most strategic areas of the country, across the Chesapeake Bay from the sprawling Naval Station Norfolk and the open Atlantic, was at the epicenter of waves of mysterious drone incursions that occurred throughout December. The War Zone has been investigating these incidents and the response to them for months. We know that they were so troubling and persistent that they prompted bringing in advanced assets from around the U.S. government, including one of NASA's WB-57F high-flying research planes. Now the U.S. Air Force has confirmed to us that they did indeed occur and provided details on the timeframe and diversity of drones involved.
This spate of bizarre drone incursions deeply underscores the still-growing threats that uncrewed aerial systems present on and off traditional battlefields, and to military and critical civilian infrastructure, issues The War Zone has been highlighting in great detail for years.
"To protect operational security, we do not discuss impacts to operations," the statement added. "We don’t discuss our specific force protection measures but retain the right to protect the installation. Langley continues to monitor our air space and work with local law enforcement and other federal agencies to ensure the safety of base personnel, facilities, and assets."
Oh...and in case you missed it, there is this intriguing little bit of information buried further down in the article, where, no doubt, the military hoped you'd miss it:
"NORAD has been conducting its routine mission of aerospace warning and aerospace control. ... [we] can confirm we conducted flight activities over Virginia various times over the past couple weeks," a spokesperson from the NORAD/NORTHCOM public affairs office told The War Zone at the time. "USNORTHCOM has been coordinating with [the] FBI, as is consistent with the combatant command’s coordinating role, but I have to refer you to [the] FBI on the nature of that law enforcement issue."
... and here's also this even more intriguing bit of information:
It is important to note that this is not the first time that Langley and other U.S. military bases across the country, including outlying U.S. territories, as well as critical civilian infrastructure, have been subjected to mysterious drone overflights. U.S. warships have also been swarmed off the coasts of the United States. U.S. military aircraft are also routinely encountering drones in various test and training ranges and other restricted military operating areas. America's nuclear power plants have had very troubling encounters with drone swarms. Yet the frequency and nature of the incursions in Virginia sound eerily similar to the bizarre claims of unidentified drone swarms roving over the plains of Colorado in the Winter of 2019-2020. The government response to those incidents was something of a meek sideshow compared to what clearly occurred regarding the Langley incidents — a sign of just how much more serious these incidents are being taken. (Italicized emphasis added)
Now you're no doubt thinking what I'm thinking, and what SCG, BW, and TS were each thinking when they emailed this same story to me. Two of them - SCG and BW - even included a brief and basic description of who they thought was responsible in the light of the article's suspicious lack of information on that subject, suspicious because with the NASA aircraft invoivement, no doubt photos and videos of the drones have been taken and analyzed, and a potential suspect or suspects already hypothesized. So in the absence of the military's own conclusions, we are left to speculate.
There are, it seems to me, three major lines of speculative possibility: (1) the military is laying in order to prepare yet another narrative and potentially a false flag. If you're the type that thinks that our government or military would never lie in aid of preparing a narrative in aid of a false flag operation then (cough hack wheeze) I have several bridges in Manhattan for sale, cheap; (2) Some portion of the drones may not be drones at all, but UFOs. Here the article is clear in its repeated use of the term "drone", which for most of us conjures the idea of a robotic, remote controlled technology of human origin. Granted, drones could be some non-human technology, but for most of us, the term connotes something human in origin, and that's the way I am interpreting its use here. Possibility (3) is that, if the technology is real and not simply a vast military psyop or narrative preparation, then the question becomes, whose drones? Are we looking at espionage, as the last paragraph cited above seems to imply? If so, by whom? China? Iran? Russia?
Ponder that last possibility for a moment. If it is drone-based espionage, then this implies the existence of espionage cells able of launching and controlling such drones. A clear violation of law, and one that would - yes - involve the FBI in its counter-intelligence roll as also noted by the article. In other words, taken at face value, the article tends to the view that the drones are of human origin, and conducting standard reconnaissance and espionage activities via that platform. The further implication of the story - also clearly implied by the article - is that the drones could be used more offensively, to interfere with actual aircraft operations in and out of air bases. Want to mess up a military jet? just fly a swarm of cheap drones in front of a landing or taking-off aircraft, and suck a few of them into the jet intake, and voila, you can probably scratch one very expensive aircraft off your inventory.
The other possibility is that the drones might be genuine UFOs (as was speculated by SCG in the email accompanying the story), or - and this one is the really intriguing possibility - the drones belong not to Russia, or to "ET", or to China, or Iran, but to some non-state actor, which could be anything, from a corporation to the World Economic Forum or even my hypothesized "Nazi International". (And really, folks, are the latter two all that distinguishable?)
In this regard, SCG informed me, it is important to mention - lest it be forgotten - that the appearance of the drones over Langley Air Force Base in approximately the same time frame that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin went "missing" for almost a whole week without the White (Out) House not even knowing of his absence might be significant. Were the two related? It's hard to avoid that conclusion. If so, then why did he go missing? The answer to that question may be much less important than why under such a potential national security threat he, and not "President" Bai Den Dzhao were important enough to go missing. I'm reminded once again of that strange statement made by Russian economist Sergei Glazyev immediately after the Maidan coup in the Ukraine in 2014: "Our problem isn't the Nazis in Kiev; out problem is the Nazis in Washington."
DRONES SWARM LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE
March 18, 2024 / Joseph P. Farrell
There's a story out that that grabbed my attention because it was shared with me no less than three times by three people who each had their own "take" on what may be going on. And before we dive into that story, you should know something: I had difficulty figuring out whether to file this story under "Nazi International" or "UFO", and chose the latter, but not because of any strong leaning toward one or another of the interpretive alternatives, but rather because this coming Wednesday's blog will definitely be filed under the former.
So with that said, you may have missed this story about drones "swarming" Langley Air Force Base in December of last year:
Mysterious Drones Swarmed Langley AFB For Weeks
Here's the story in a nutshell, from the first four paragraphs::
Langley Air Force Base, located in one of the most strategic areas of the country, across the Chesapeake Bay from the sprawling Naval Station Norfolk and the open Atlantic, was at the epicenter of waves of mysterious drone incursions that occurred throughout December. The War Zone has been investigating these incidents and the response to them for months. We know that they were so troubling and persistent that they prompted bringing in advanced assets from around the U.S. government, including one of NASA's WB-57F high-flying research planes. Now the U.S. Air Force has confirmed to us that they did indeed occur and provided details on the timeframe and diversity of drones involved.
Oh...and in case you missed it, there is this intriguing little bit of information buried further down in the article, where, no doubt, the military hoped you'd miss it:
... and here's also this even more intriguing bit of information:
Now you're no doubt thinking what I'm thinking, and what SCG, BW, and TS were each thinking when they emailed this same story to me. Two of them - SCG and BW - even included a brief and basic description of who they thought was responsible in the light of the article's suspicious lack of information on that subject, suspicious because with the NASA aircraft invoivement, no doubt photos and videos of the drones have been taken and analyzed, and a potential suspect or suspects already hypothesized. So in the absence of the military's own conclusions, we are left to speculate.
There are, it seems to me, three major lines of speculative possibility: (1) the military is laying in order to prepare yet another narrative and potentially a false flag. If you're the type that thinks that our government or military would never lie in aid of preparing a narrative in aid of a false flag operation then (cough hack wheeze) I have several bridges in Manhattan for sale, cheap; (2) Some portion of the drones may not be drones at all, but UFOs. Here the article is clear in its repeated use of the term "drone", which for most of us conjures the idea of a robotic, remote controlled technology of human origin. Granted, drones could be some non-human technology, but for most of us, the term connotes something human in origin, and that's the way I am interpreting its use here. Possibility (3) is that, if the technology is real and not simply a vast military psyop or narrative preparation, then the question becomes, whose drones? Are we looking at espionage, as the last paragraph cited above seems to imply? If so, by whom? China? Iran? Russia?
Ponder that last possibility for a moment. If it is drone-based espionage, then this implies the existence of espionage cells able of launching and controlling such drones. A clear violation of law, and one that would - yes - involve the FBI in its counter-intelligence roll as also noted by the article. In other words, taken at face value, the article tends to the view that the drones are of human origin, and conducting standard reconnaissance and espionage activities via that platform. The further implication of the story - also clearly implied by the article - is that the drones could be used more offensively, to interfere with actual aircraft operations in and out of air bases. Want to mess up a military jet? just fly a swarm of cheap drones in front of a landing or taking-off aircraft, and suck a few of them into the jet intake, and voila, you can probably scratch one very expensive aircraft off your inventory.
The other possibility is that the drones might be genuine UFOs (as was speculated by SCG in the email accompanying the story), or - and this one is the really intriguing possibility - the drones belong not to Russia, or to "ET", or to China, or Iran, but to some non-state actor, which could be anything, from a corporation to the World Economic Forum or even my hypothesized "Nazi International". (And really, folks, are the latter two all that distinguishable?)
In this regard, SCG informed me, it is important to mention - lest it be forgotten - that the appearance of the drones over Langley Air Force Base in approximately the same time frame that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin went "missing" for almost a whole week without the White (Out) House not even knowing of his absence might be significant. Were the two related? It's hard to avoid that conclusion. If so, then why did he go missing? The answer to that question may be much less important than why under such a potential national security threat he, and not "President" Bai Den Dzhao were important enough to go missing. I'm reminded once again of that strange statement made by Russian economist Sergei Glazyev immediately after the Maidan coup in the Ukraine in 2014: "Our problem isn't the Nazis in Kiev; out problem is the Nazis in Washington."
UF0’s are Nazi Tech— foo fighters… Tesla Tech