I didn't say anything about number of moving parts. You just keep making up new stuff to argue with yourself about, never stopping to think. And all you can come up with are insults when you can't think yourself out of a corner.
Less moving parts equals less complicated design, I thought that was pretty obvious. Then you showed that you didn't understand that very simple design feature, so I felt the need be more specific. Less complicated = less moving parts. More complicated = more moving parts, it's not that hard to understand bruh.
Oh the classic No U response. Great. Well researched.
I didn't say anything about number of moving parts. You just keep making up new stuff to argue with yourself about, never stopping to think. And all you can come up with are insults when you can't think yourself out of a corner.
Less moving parts equals less complicated design, I thought that was pretty obvious. Then you showed that you didn't understand that very simple design feature, so I felt the need be more specific. Less complicated = less moving parts. More complicated = more moving parts, it's not that hard to understand bruh.