https://twitter.com/JackStr42679640/status/1770420541381652819
WHAT A MOVIE FOR THE NORMIES
THE END OF DEEP STATE.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano exposes Pizzagate and names Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and former editor of The Recount, Slade Sohmer, who was recently arrested for child porn.
He also discusses how Jeffrey Epstein ran a blackmail operation on his island and collected evidence of well-known people committing heinous ritual crimes against children.
I wonder about Vigano. It’s good that he is talking about it, but I wonder how effective it is. He is just repeating things that were discovered back in 2015, with no new information or proof. It’s a poorly done cliff notes version of what was actually uncovered on r/pizzagate, cbts, cbtsstream, voat/pizzagate and other places at the time.
He doesn’t even do a good job of explaining how pizzagate was never actually debunked. He makes old claims, doesn’t really present the evidence when there actually is evidence to present and just declares his claims as true. If I were a normie looking at this, I would be unconvinced and wonder why he is not substantiating his claims. Sometimes I think Vigano could be controlled opposition. His rhetoric appeals to many on our side, but appears laughable and flimsy to the average person.
I think the audience that he reaches is more important than how well he plays the role of investigative journalist.
If he gets the ball rolling for others to take it from there going forward, that is good enough for me.
That’s my point though. He is doing the opposite of getting the ball rolling. His stuff gets circulated by people who also can’t articulate why pizzagate is real and then laughed at outside of his echo chamber.
TBF he has a greater reach than us who have researched, we talk amongst ourselves, people come and go but are we really having a great impact.
Vigano speaks to larger audience especially in the conservative catholic community. He also has a position people look up to, more respected than an random internet user in a comment section.
He's playing his part and he's taken to the battlefield and warning people, some of those people will look further others don't give a shit or can't handle it and want to bury their head in the sand.
That’s my point. He has a massive reach and is a poor choice to deliver the message. It doesn’t mean I think he had bad intentions or lacks importance. I personally think his large following is detrimental because of the way he “declares” things. It reminds me of the BOMBSHELL!!! BREAKING NEWS!!! BS that waters down and discredits the message. I fully acknowledge I am in the minority here with this opinion.