I feel like this is an extremely unpopular opinion but I really don't think republicanism was a step forward for humanity.
Monarchy is the most intuitive form of government. People tend to take care of what they own, and politicians have no incentive to leave anything better for the next generation because they really have no stake in their country. Their legacy dies with them.
A monarchy with constitutional (and familial) checks and balances is vastly preferable to a republic where the foreign interests run free and loot the taxpayers. It's pure and much simpler. No Congress, no Supreme Court, no ridiculous sham elections. Everyone knows who's in charge and what the rules are.
That's fine. But let's not fool ourselves into thinking that the old-world monarchists, and their old-world money isn't behind most of the problems that America has today. For example, IDGAF about Duke Ferdinand, and I know damn good and well that the British monarch sunk the Lusitania with a false-flag attack.
The British monarchy was NOT an elected monarchy but a hereditary one. Hereditary monarchies generally tended to suck because the son of the king was not guaranteed to be competent or have the best interests of his people at heart. Also their rulers and their spy chiefs (John Dee) just sat around conjuring evil spirits and doing seances so they became insanely corrupted and are part and parcel with the NWO.