🚫NWO🚫gop-led-state-senate-approves-legislation-stating-the-wef-who-un-have-no-jurisdiction-or-power-within-state
(100percentfedup.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
I think, when all is said and done and we're finished taking all our power back, that some Constitutional Amendments need to be added. Specifically, one that states that ALL 50 States SHALL ratify any prospective treaties the Federal Govt wishes to sign with any foreign govt or foreign alliance like NATO, WEF, UN, WHO, etc and that it SHALL BE a UNANIMOUS DECISION by ALL 50 STATES (or how ever many states are left at the end). Each state's legislative branch SHALL make the vote for their representative state, and each individual State's legislative branch MUST BE IN FULL AGREEMENT (meaning each State's legislative branch must ALSO pass a unanimous vote for their state). This is one of the very few ways We, The People will be able to ensure that our duly AND FAIRLY elected representatives have our interests in mind.
We MUST HAVE a more equal representation of our global interests instead of leaving them to the decisions of just a few hundred very susceptible and corruptible people. By demanding unanimous votes for things th Fed Govt wants, it makes it near impossible for [them] and [their] corruption to get through and continue like it has for as long as it has. In my mind, a TRULY Representative Govt would be in ein which The PEOPLE have more of a say in how we choose to be governed, even if they means holding monthly votes and dedicating one day each month for those votes. If we include the individual state legislatures and/or The People ourselves in votes like adopting NATO, UN, WHO, etc, the sheer number of people voting, and who also have to agree unanimously makes it extremely difficult for anyone to corrupt it.
That sounds good. But here is something to think about: If we continue to allow mail-in voting, and internet voting, why do we even need representatives to cast votes "for us?"