Just a few days ago, I outed myself as a VP fag when I announced my call for the DJT VP: Michael Flynn.
Not a lot has changed, and a big factor in that conclusion was the absence of any other viable contenders that I could see.
That lack of viable contenders includes all the 'celebrity pics" (I will call them), which (for reasons that escape me) apparently seem viable to some anons. This group includes Tucker Carlson, RFK jnr, Kari Lake, Don. Jr., etc.
Other more establishment-type contenders also seem non-viable to me: Ben Carson, Whathisname Scott, current politically actives, etc.
For me, there are several core requirements that need to be fulfilled:
Fully on board with MAGA
Fully on board with the Q operation (i.e. able to understand and be supportive of the objectives and methods of the Q operation, intel war)
Ability (i.e. character and capacity) to follow up the next DJT term by leading America into the restoration of its core values and direction after the swamp is drained and destroyed - aka strength of character and personality
Trust and reliability with regards to DJT
An adequate public profile (aka known by enough of the American people, has a certain level of name recognition)
Tested track record in terms of public service
I never thought of Nunes, but in my view, he also seems to fulfill these core criteria, by and large.
The only one I would not be fully confident in is the third one: is Nunes truly POTUS material, in the vein of people like Andrews, Lincoln, Kennedy, Reagan, Eisenhower, etc? Trump is such a powerful leader, and I think that America (and the world) is going to need a very strong and powerful followup act.
That said, I don't know whether or not (I don't have any strong sense that) Nunes actually has that strength of character and personality, but that's a question mark: unknown. Not a negative check mark by any means (whereas with plenty of other non-viable candidates, I think they clearly fail in the third criteria.
Someone asked the other day if Vice President fagging is a thing. I had to reach a conclusion that it is.
While I haven't changed my view re: Flynn, I have to admit that Nunes is probably the only other really viable candidate I can currently think of.
Very solid possibility.
I guess the question is: has Stone been chosen to seed the narrative?
Just a few days ago, I outed myself as a VP fag when I announced my call for the DJT VP: Michael Flynn.
Not a lot has changed, and a big factor in that conclusion was the absence of any other viable contenders that I could see.
That lack of viable contenders includes all the 'celebrity pics" (I will call them), which (for reasons that escape me) apparently seem viable to some anons. This group includes Tucker Carlson, RFK jnr, Kari Lake, Don. Jr., etc.
Other more establishment-type contenders also seem non-viable to me: Ben Carson, Whathisname Scott, current politically actives, etc.
For me, there are several core requirements that need to be fulfilled:
Fully on board with MAGA
Fully on board with the Q operation (i.e. able to understand and be supportive of the objectives and methods of the Q operation, intel war)
Ability (i.e. character and capacity) to follow up the next DJT term by leading America into the restoration of its core values and direction after the swamp is drained and destroyed - aka strength of character and personality
Trust and reliability with regards to DJT
An adequate public profile (aka known by enough of the American people, has a certain level of name recognition)
Tested track record in terms of public service
I never thought of Nunes, but in my view, he also seems to fulfill these core criteria, by and large.
The only one I would not be fully confident in is the third one: is Nunes truly POTUS material, in the vein of people like Andrews, Lincoln, Kennedy, Reagan, Eisenhower, etc? Trump is such a powerful leader, and I think that America (and the world) is going to need a very strong and powerful followup act.
That said, I don't know whether or not (I don't have any strong sense that) Nunes actually has that strength of character and personality, but that's a question mark: unknown. Not a negative check mark by any means (whereas with plenty of other non-viable candidates, I think they clearly fail in the third criteria.
Someone asked the other day if Vice President fagging is a thing. I had to reach a conclusion that it is.
While I haven't changed my view re: Flynn, I have to admit that Nunes is probably the only other really viable candidate I can currently think of.
Very solid possibility.
I guess the question is: has Stone been chosen to seed the narrative?
If he picks Erik Prince, you know s#!t’s about to get real.