Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
Apply the socratic method: For what reason an indicment becomes sealed ? What reasons justify keeping it sealed ? When and how an indicment gets unsealed. What events can make indictments baloon up like they do in those specific districts ?
Research,formulate, then discuss.
K
ekshot
Oh I have used socratric reasoning to arrive just at what you are implying. I did it like 5 years ago when these were first noticed. What blows my mind, since then, is that there hasn't been:
-leaks.
-investigative journalism.
-Psyop misdirections.
-deeper theories about what it means.
-Deeper analysis.
Because people on the list don’t want to find anything that might trigger them unsealing the list?