1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, just agreed it was pretty awesome

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean the internal organizations, like NAIT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Islamic_Trust

They seem to help fund and settle Muslims all over the country.

That video yesterday was from @braindeadgroup on YouTube. Kek.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Martin Shkrelli, live, interrupted his own livestream to walk from his apartment to Chelsea’s, where he shouted “DROP OUT” at her from across the street.

Was absolutely glorious. The system didn’t like him much after that.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah, so “anyone in government”.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

The “half loaded”… I’ve seen some dreadful attempts at such ministry on YouTube from people who don’t understand and haven’t practiced that you can’t reach a person on your terms, it has to be on theirs.

Not precisely one of my skills, either. I bet lawyers probably swim in those methods for breakfast.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

When the Jews are active, that's when they can be dialogued with about what idolatry really is!

No doubt. I’m trying hard to get to a point of ministering to Jews. Got a way to go as yet, and don’t want to go off half-loaded. Some of them know much more than me, and the other ones tend to take any questions to their rabbi without engaging in thought.

The two people in this thread don’t believe I’m not Jewish. Kek.

“Do you condemn the Talmud!?!”

“Why would I? It records validation that the events of the crucifixion happened, and many other valid historical records.”

Blinded by hate or intentional agitators, one of the two. Same problem as liberals.

so as to treat Christians as idolaters

Yeah, which was sketchily presented in the video, but I do suspect it could be defeated with some basic understandings if it were to happen.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just saw a video, and this lady ... seems to have some incoherency in what she says … but one thing she says that could be a legitimate issue for Christianity if true is that faithfulness to Jesus counts as idolatry.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=1zriiAOZnww

If that’s true, a lot of Christianity could have trouble under prevailing doctrine, and with current understandings of prophetic fulfillment.

I suspect the issue could be addressed with some very small tweaks, but don’t expect those to come from seminary-trained pastors.

Edit: for Protestants anyway, as the Catholics actually do engage in idolatry.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to downplay this, screw Walmart, but do note that Murphy is right next door to EPIC / Plano in the Islamic section of Dallas. It does indicate a spread, but it’s also still right in a known area of concentration.

Don’t shop at Walmart anyway.

There’s other spots in Texas, and other states, that aren’t being discussed yet. We need more eyes on the organizations running the operations…

I’ll see if I can dig those organizations back up, have named them before.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh yeah, 'known' by who? I know there was all sorts of the usual anons speculation and people promoting theories that Evergreen shipping was transporting children, trafficking them especially in the trapped Suez incident, but is there any actual evidence of this? On the public record?

Public record? No idea.

One other anon speculation source is an episode of Dexter, though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePluPHudnAA

Also u/n0rds and u/2eyesopen comments. Would be worth a good dive to see if there’s any meat with all them potatos.

I see a few threads on it

This is a topic that this frog isn’t keen to deep dive into primary sources on, though…

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

cancelzion: Wikipedia, really? Lol

Yes. Really.

The definition there matches with other definitions I saw, so why wouldn’t I put that one?

Wikipedia is like Alex Jones, great for getting a lot of information, but if anyone trusts it implicitly, they’re being stupid.

I note that you didn’t refute the definition, but attack using the “wrong” source.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks! It’s so weird when you’re just walking along and boop! fall into a rabbit hole!

view more: Next ›