1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Green verses are NT, which they would not care about, but the others are Tanakh / OT and should be followed. If the Talmud is in conflict with them, the Talmud is wrong.

Genesis 12:2 - And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing.

12:3 (partial) - and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.

It is not possible to be a blessing if you are actively and intentionally creating misery and suffering.

Galatians 3:16 - Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, “And to offsprings,” referring to many, but referring to one, “And to your offspring,” who is Christ.

Galatians 3:7 - Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham.

Matthew 25:40 - And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

Exodus 23:9 - “You shall not oppress a sojourner. You know the heart of a sojourner, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt.

Leviticus 19:34 - You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.

“Do not oppress those who are not from among you.”

There is much more.

Hate doesn’t drive out hate any more than dark drives out dark, only love can drive out hate. That said, game theory is in play right now for a reason as well, it’s also wrong to deny Justice or to allow yourself and others to be abused.

The proper path requires balance.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

100%

Also not saying anything is one way or the other, just pointing out some directional issues we’d need to wrestle with in one, while saying what I hope is maybe going on with the other.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is also possible that this guy is being used to expose something else, considering he works for Thiel.

If Thiel is also waging war against us, him and Vance being so close is highly concerning, and it’s curious why he’s been such a big Trump supporter if Trump is also on our side.

Things get pretty dicey to fundamental thought paradigms here if Thiel’s on the bad team, basically. Not that it’s off the table, but it’d be a huge knock against what we’ve been thinking.

https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZuPZdiy/x/c/4eU3oDVwn7y

https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZpdEPnE/x/c/4eU3UYdGQ4c

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m very much more concerned about HAARP and what other capabilities they might have, BUT they also need to come clean with what they’re doing here, why, and why they not only have refused to say anything about it but also respond with extreme gaslighting us when we talk about it.

If this wasn’t involved and responsible for these floods, and I actually doubt they were (contrary to what killerspacerobot wants to accuse me of thinking) then why the hell are they lying, FUDding, and denying it so hard?

Why the uptick in these long lasting contrails? Did the cruising altitude really just go higher so they last longer? How are we supposed to trust those claims when they’ve been lying about the rest of this crap?

WTAF is the truth about this, and why all the lying?

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I figured somebody would provide that.

Those items in the Talmud are in conflict with scripture, and thus not valid. Hard to be a blessing to the nations if the command is to treat them like dogs.

Pretty sure my assertion that there is corruption across most/all organizations and creeds, including against children, is still correct.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

First of all, it’s real hard to see John Krasinski saying that.

If I may throw some biblical context on this one.

Exodus 22:2

2If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. 3If the sun be risen upon him, there shall be blood shed for him; for he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft. 4If the theft be certainly found in his hand alive, whether it be ox, or ass, or sheep; he shall restore double.

And some nice context from AI:

The Bible addresses the issue of killing an intruder in Exodus 22:2-3. It states:

Nighttime Intrusion: If a thief is caught breaking into a house at night and is killed, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed. Daytime Intrusion: If the same situation occurs during the day, the defender may be considered guilty of bloodshed. Context and Interpretation

Self-Defense: The scripture implies that defending oneself or one's property is permissible, especially at night when the threat is perceived to be greater.

Intent: The law distinguishes between the time of the incident, suggesting that the intent of the intruder and the circumstances of the defense play a crucial role in determining guilt.

Additional Considerations

Restitution: The Bible also emphasizes restitution for theft. If a thief is caught, they must repay what they have stolen, which reinforces the importance of property rights.

Moral Implications: While the law allows for self-defense, it also encourages caution and consideration of the situation, especially during daylight hours.

This biblical guidance reflects a balance between the right to protect oneself and the moral implications of taking a life.

2
AmateurExpert 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you wanted to hide generations of elite abuse, where would you put it? Answer: in a “child protection” org no one would dare question.

Does anyone else get a disturbed feeling every time they see an Amber Alert?

More wonder if “one got away” at this point, rather than “hopefully they find her!”

That Gerry has an interesting biography. The namesake of gerrymandering, a merchant, a VP nobody widely knows of, important in the constitution drafting process, tied to all sorts of elite power families. Probably worth looking into more.

4
AmateurExpert 4 points ago +4 / -0

(Funny enough, the sarcasm wasn’t aimed at you. I think your statement is obvious. Run with it, we’ll teach these bastards how to kayfabe if it’s the last thing we do! Thelma and Louise, baby! You be Louise, I’m way too pretty to pull that role off.)

5
AmateurExpert 5 points ago +5 / -0

No. No way, Obvious Statement Man.

There is no way that anyone would pretend to be doing something in politics.

This is all very super real.

Super duper super real, even. Very.

If it was any realer it would slap us all in our very real faces with a very real sea bass.

This is not fog of war, you just need war foglights. Trump clearly did not know how weak Pam Bondi was and put her in charge of things she couldn’t handle, and now the former secret service agent is showing his weak-kneed stripes as well.

Trump just needs to learn how to hire people and run organizations! They should put me in charge of all of this, I could do so much better!

Anyone who thinks this isn’t real is clearly a mouth breathing ape. It is so real. Really really real. Nobody would do a psyop, and none of us would fall for it even though every last one of us knows that psyops are very real and plentiful. If it was a psyop, Trump and Bondi would warn us first so we didn’t do retarded things like thinking an incredibly obvious psyop fake-out was a psyop.

The sooner you realize this is all very very real the better, Mister Obvious Statement Man. Name doesn’t check out!

Can someone please confirm how real and not sarcastic this is for Obvious Statement Man? More like Obvious WRONG Statement Man! Goodness!

Trust the Plan! Psshhh! More like wash the pan! Just look at all these dirty dishes!

I’m not being dense! You’re being dense for not seeing all the very obvious, very real realness of all of this!!!

u/mods deport this obvious man for not seeing how really really real all this realness is!

Pam is going to fire Dan, but Kash will stand up and say, No! Pam! You can’t fire Dan! We’re having a baby! That’s why we can’t investigate all the Epsteins! Trump knew. Oh yes he knew. It was only you, Pam, because you’re not worthy to be the DOJ top dog. More like top FROG, Pam! I already know from Trump himself that he is going to fire you and make ME DOJ top dog, then I will solve ALL the Epsteins! You’ll see! You’ll all see!!! Quick, Dan! Hold her down and I’ll shave her head for doing so bad on these investigations! What a waste of time she made!

OW!!! Ow, Dan! Why did you bodyslam me?! You aren’t… you aren’t going to side with HER are you!? I always knew you were just a sucker for a pretty face! Side gig at work, huh Dan? I knew it!!! I never should have hired you for Assistant FBI Director! How disappointing! You’ll never work in this town again, Dan, do you hear me?!? Never again!!!

6
AmateurExpert 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’m enjoying how she’s waving some document around on camera like it’s one of Trump’s executive orders.

Is that some city ordinance she’s signed? A unilateral decree of the mayor’s office? Repurposing of the Misc. Funds account? A gold sticker award for an underprivileged kindergartener? An order for 500 pizzas and $15,000 in hotdogs?

Nice job copying someone else’s homework at any rate, Karen.

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

For now, just be thankful they’re coming around at all.

5
AmateurExpert 5 points ago +5 / -0

Talmud has some verses that direction, according to comments here, however the Tanakh (Old Testament) doesn’t.

Meanwhile, I have seen Episcopal churches flying banners of “PROTECT TRANS KIDS”, we all know about the Catholic issues that got swept under the rug years ago, and even the Baptists have had some problems outside of simple obesity.

…Some denominations, and specific congregations, are going to be much farther off course than others. No aggregate is a monolith, though trends certainly happen. “Hi, Teacher Unions!”

In short, this problem exists outside of any specific label.

3
AmateurExpert 3 points ago +3 / -0

See, SID MILLER, Lee Zeldin here is giving an example of the sort of responses that people would appreciate.

This sort of respectful engagement plays much better than calling Americans “conspiracy theorists” and deflecting to feigned piety in response to justifiable concern following several sequential major tragedies.

Why don’t you go inspect the fertilizer right quick, Sid?

1
AmateurExpert 1 point ago +1 / -0

As you noted, “you don’t do evil to do good”. I missed that sentence as a precursor to “winning is what matters”. With that, we are basically saying the same thing.

I could still try and give your question a shot, but it’s admittedly a tough one to answer.

view more: Next ›