Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
Military courts can process sealed indictments. Military courts function similarly to civilian courts in many respects, including the handling of sealed indictments. However, the specific procedures for handling sealed indictments in military courts may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the rules established by the military justice system in that country.
In the United States, for example, military courts operate under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The UCMJ provides provisions for the handling of sealed indictments, just as civilian courts do. Sealed indictments in military courts may serve similar purposes as in civilian courts, such as protecting ongoing investigations, preserving evidence, or ensuring the safety of witnesses.
While military courts may have their own specific procedures and regulations governing the handling of sealed indictments, they generally follow principles similar to those in civilian courts. This includes considerations for when and how an indictment may be unsealed, typically through court order or upon request from the prosecution or defense.