Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
Police are not part of the prosecutors office. either.
Would those who help foreign entities be civilians any longer ?
Infiltration has made America the battleground.
Almost being an important caveat , for JAGs
They are in fact law enforcement.
Military Intelligence is not.
No.
The ISIS terrorist who killed 8 in NYC in 2017? Civilian court.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/sayfullo-saipov-be-sentenced-life-prison-2017-truck-attack-isis
The Walkers? Said to be the most damaging spies ever? Civilian court.
The son was still.in the Navy and arrested onboard his ship. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1985/05/26/spy-suspect-turned-over-to-the-fbi/033174e2-a59e-4a20-81a0-77316021ec56/
As Kavanaugh said to Lady Lindsey some laws are military some are civilian , -depends .
Police investigate and arrest then turn case over to prosecutors office for enforcement. MI Intelligence uses MP's or fighting personnel for the strong arm work of "enforcement" like the police.
Military Intelligence is not involved in pursuing crimes even military ones.
Period
They are not MPs.
Their job involves supporting military operations. The only way they would be involved in law enforcement might be if their counter intelligence role turned up something connected to military personnel.
They are not involved in domestic Indictments. If they turned up something connected to a regular civilain they would turn it over to the FBI.
So they don't collect facts ? They don't provided those facts to appropriate recipients when those facts affect National Security and/or Military readiness ? If the FBI were infiltrated by Russia they would still turn over proof of those facts to the FBI?
Logic is required.