Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
You're just speculating because someone once speculated (incorrectly IMO) that these cases in PACER involve military intelligence.
Someone claimed the "470" that Q mentioned was military intelligence.
But an early Q drop goes into great detail that 470 is the number of investigators in the DOJ office of IG. Q said they were working with Huber.
So I think this trail is off the main path.
Narrow is the path that leads to salvation , but easy to see is the main path. Interesting , to only mention of civilian.
"The Justice Department, CIA, and NSA are all in with big tech. That came out of the weaponization hearings."
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/alex-jones-i-already-knew-cia-fbi-was/
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1MewlRy/trumps-secret-60k-army-wow-must-/c/
Did you go and read the Newsweek article by William Arkin?
Did you read what these thousands of people actually do?
Also Arkin is not a fan of Trump
Yep , that's Trumps remaining Target audience , good analysis.
Walking backwards in another's path will hide a trail. Moccasins or not.
You need to ask Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud what happened in Las Vegas ?
Who disrupted what ever was planned and was your FBI a string puller or puppet ?