I agree with most of this. But how do we separate the forced to take the jab from those who couldn't get in line fast enough for their boosters?
I gotta say, maybe it's not right for me to feel this way, but.... It will not sit well with me if the co-workers and family member who shamed us for not getting the jab end up being compensated for their stupidity.
I share your concern but whether people lined up willingly or were forced to take it, a criminal scam instigated everything. Those who can show proof of harm should be compensated in greater measure but a base compensation should be awarded for weakening the immune system and increasing the potential for future harm. Perhaps those that stood their ground and refused the jab should be given a special tax break and debt forgiveness only they can receive? That and maybe an official letter of apology signed by those convicted admitting to their role in the scam. Something they can wave in the faces of all the Karens in their life?
While there is a big difference in those two groups, from a legal standpoint those that willingly took it are just as much of a victim as those that were coerced. There was no informed consent… anywhere. The truth and data were hidden and the risks were deliberately hidden to all.
I agree with most of this. But how do we separate the forced to take the jab from those who couldn't get in line fast enough for their boosters?
I gotta say, maybe it's not right for me to feel this way, but.... It will not sit well with me if the co-workers and family member who shamed us for not getting the jab end up being compensated for their stupidity.
I share your concern but whether people lined up willingly or were forced to take it, a criminal scam instigated everything. Those who can show proof of harm should be compensated in greater measure but a base compensation should be awarded for weakening the immune system and increasing the potential for future harm. Perhaps those that stood their ground and refused the jab should be given a special tax break and debt forgiveness only they can receive? That and maybe an official letter of apology signed by those convicted admitting to their role in the scam. Something they can wave in the faces of all the Karens in their life?
While there is a big difference in those two groups, from a legal standpoint those that willingly took it are just as much of a victim as those that were coerced. There was no informed consent… anywhere. The truth and data were hidden and the risks were deliberately hidden to all.
There would be the added layer of bringing justice on the employers/venues who required it.