I am a bit shocked by the people that are shouting about the complete corruption of our legal system and corruption and lying of the media all jumping on the hateful condemnation of OJ Simpson, because they’re just positive he committed double murder. Well the tv told you so you know. I won’t discuss or argue the case with anyone that didn’t read Killing Time by Donald Freed and Raymond Briggs. My husband (and a couple friends, who are all Caucasian) watched the entire trial in real time. We were often astonished at the news coverage that would report one thing and we watched the actual testimony with our own eyes. The verdict was absolutely correct as the evidence did not match up with OJ. It just didn’t. Had I been on the jury, I would have voted Not Guilty. The civil trial was a joke and I firmly believe that suing someone civilly after they were found Not Guilty in a criminal court is double jeopardy.
I’m not saying OJ was a good guy. He could be a total jerk and a terrible husband. I’m just saying based on all the evidence he didn’t do it. Killing Time gives the evidence presented, some not allowed in & some suppressed (like three other waiters from the restaurant met either a violet death or disappeared. One was sliced and diced like Goldman) It presents a couple different scenarios of who did it based on the evidence. I’ve always leaned to a drug killing where the killers (definitely more than one) thought the envelope with the glasses held drug money. Nicole was killed as a “leave no witness”. The prosecution and the judge would not allow any evidence or testimony that any way tainted Nicole or Goldman.
You can think what you want, but it does dismay me that even in this community where most know that the media and legal system has lied and lied, are still lying and are totally corrupt….except in the OJ case.
I am a bit shocked by the people that are shouting about the complete corruption of our legal system and corruption and lying of the media all jumping on the hateful condemnation of OJ Simpson, because they’re just positive he committed double murder. Well the tv told you so you know. I won’t discuss or argue the case with anyone that didn’t read Killing Time by Donald Freed and Raymond Briggs. My husband (and a couple friends, who are all Caucasian) watched the entire trial in real time. We were often astonished at the news coverage that would report one thing and we watched the actual testimony with our own eyes. The verdict was absolutely correct as the evidence did not match up with OJ. It just didn’t. Had I been on the jury, I would have voted Not Guilty. The civil trial was a joke and I firmly believe that suing someone civilly after they were found Not Guilty in a criminal court is double jeopardy.
I’m not saying OJ was a good guy. He could be a total jerk and a terrible husband. I’m just saying based on all the evidence he didn’t do it. Killing Time gives the evidence presented, some not allowed in & some suppressed (like three other waiters from the restaurant met either a violet death or disappeared. One was sliced and diced like Goldman) It presents a couple different scenarios of who did it based on the evidence. I’ve always leaned to a drug killing where the killers (definitely more than one) thought the envelope with the glasses held drug money. Nicole was killed as a “leave no witness”. The prosecution and the judge would not allow any evidence or testimony that any way tainted Nicole or Goldman.
You can think what you want, but it does dismay me that even in this community where most know that the media and legal system has lied and lied, are still lying and are totally corrupt….except in the OJ case.