I would argue that we're at a point where we have evolved to encompass more than just the Q posts and discussion surrounding; That we have grown to seeking all truth that those sleeping have been unaware of.
Q was our origin and what brought us together in pursuit of truth. Now we must be free to dig, to discuss, to find.
For instance, the dog getting treatment should be allowed to remain because Fenbendazole, like Ivermectin, has been theorized and is said to be useful in dogs and humans against cancer. That post is an experiment to test said theory. As an informational and direct experience, it should remain.
The sister having a baby is likely a prayer request, which should always be allowed. If we don't like it, we can downvote it and move on.
It shouldn't be up to the mods to determine what is viable information and what is drivel.
It should be up to us, collectively, as a group. In this regard, had many more of us agreed with you and also reported a post to the point of action, THEN it should fall under mod review.
A single rogue mod should not have the power to ban posts or comments or frens.
Again, Cats has gone beyond these parameters and I disagree strongly with this.
Must disagree. This is not a religious page, any prayer request should be put under general chat. The dog was put in general chat after I reported it, then I got a one day ban for it. One mod agreed with me, while another mod banned me. Fenben experimentally in a human could be reported, but in a dog, no. Many meds for animals do not cross over to humans. The other way is more viable, as ivermectin was created for humans, but found to kill bacteria/ parasites in horses.
I would argue that we're at a point where we have evolved to encompass more than just the Q posts and discussion surrounding; That we have grown to seeking all truth that those sleeping have been unaware of.
Q was our origin and what brought us together in pursuit of truth. Now we must be free to dig, to discuss, to find.
For instance, the dog getting treatment should be allowed to remain because Fenbendazole, like Ivermectin, has been theorized and is said to be useful in dogs and humans against cancer. That post is an experiment to test said theory. As an informational and direct experience, it should remain.
The sister having a baby is likely a prayer request, which should always be allowed. If we don't like it, we can downvote it and move on.
It shouldn't be up to the mods to determine what is viable information and what is drivel.
It should be up to us, collectively, as a group. In this regard, had many more of us agreed with you and also reported a post to the point of action, THEN it should fall under mod review.
A single rogue mod should not have the power to ban posts or comments or frens.
Again, Cats has gone beyond these parameters and I disagree strongly with this.
Must disagree. This is not a religious page, any prayer request should be put under general chat. The dog was put in general chat after I reported it, then I got a one day ban for it. One mod agreed with me, while another mod banned me. Fenben experimentally in a human could be reported, but in a dog, no. Many meds for animals do not cross over to humans. The other way is more viable, as ivermectin was created for humans, but found to kill bacteria/ parasites in horses.