Fair enough. There are other places for that, though. I think we tend to get sidetracked from the main focus when something extremely polarizing gets forcefully pushed in an area where it doesn't belong, such as a Q-focused board. This topic, and others (flat Earth, for instance), also tend to be binary in nature and don't ever seem to be open to debate by those who believe such things.
To each his own. I still think revealing government cover ups is an important awakening regardless whether it polarizes. Also, it's classic to discredit someone's argument by lumping them into the flat earth category. Happens whenever someone wants to discredit a fringe topic. The evidence for the faked moon landings is substantial.
I used flat Earth as an example, as it's another belief that is zealously pushed and applied in a binary manner. My emphasis, and hence my point, was the zealotry applied to such topics, rather than my opinion on them, as well as the topic of this particular board, which is Q. My opinion of said topics has no bearing on the point of this discussion, and the irony of pointing out my so-called "lumping" made me chuckle a bit.
Government lies should be fair game for discussion. All interwoven.
Fair enough. There are other places for that, though. I think we tend to get sidetracked from the main focus when something extremely polarizing gets forcefully pushed in an area where it doesn't belong, such as a Q-focused board. This topic, and others (flat Earth, for instance), also tend to be binary in nature and don't ever seem to be open to debate by those who believe such things.
To each his own. I still think revealing government cover ups is an important awakening regardless whether it polarizes. Also, it's classic to discredit someone's argument by lumping them into the flat earth category. Happens whenever someone wants to discredit a fringe topic. The evidence for the faked moon landings is substantial.
I used flat Earth as an example, as it's another belief that is zealously pushed and applied in a binary manner. My emphasis, and hence my point, was the zealotry applied to such topics, rather than my opinion on them, as well as the topic of this particular board, which is Q. My opinion of said topics has no bearing on the point of this discussion, and the irony of pointing out my so-called "lumping" made me chuckle a bit.