The headline of this story is completely wrong. It says they admitted a violation, but if you read the letter they posted it is just a notice that the board was going to consider the report they were given. For some reason they underlined a part that says "this matter is in the violation found category" as if that was proof that they were admitting to violations.
Really all the letter says is that they were given a report from a private investigator and that report looked at several things. For some of those things they claim they didn't find violations and for other things they claim they found violations. The letter just says that in the meeting they would be discussing the parts of the report that claims they found violations, that is the "violation found category" the letter is talking about. It doesn't admit anything, it just says they're going to have a meeting to review the parts of the report that claims there are violations and decide if they need to submit it to the attorney general.
The headline of this story is completely wrong. It says they admitted a violation, but if you read the letter they posted it is just a notice that the board was going to consider the report they were given. For some reason they underlined a part that says "this matter is in the violation found category" as if that was proof that they were admitting to violations.
Really all the letter says is that they were given a report from a private investigator and that report looked at several things. For some of those things they claim they didn't find violations and for other things they claim they found violations. The letter just says that in the meeting they would be discussing the parts of the report that claims they found violations, that is the "violation found category" the letter is talking about. It doesn't admit anything, it just says they're going to have a meeting to review the parts of the report that claims there are violations and decide if they need to submit it to the attorney general.
That’s G-P for ya.