HMMM.
Smartmatic suddenly drops 2020 "election lies" lawsuit against OAN and coughs up hush money to avoid discovery
(lawandcrime.com)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
This makes no logical sense. Why would a plaintiff pay a defense to drop their own case?
The article does not say Smartmatic paid anything.
In fact, the hints are that they did not.
https://twitter.com/jeremymbarr/status/1780274908309622867
Inferring "hush money" from "confidential settlement" is reasonable.
How do you infer who paid who from that?
Look at the details.
So Smartmatic sued OAN for defamation. That is civil. You pay money if you lose. Then Smartmatic starts alleging federal crimes.
Seems like the messiness was in one direction. If this true OAN had a motive to stop discovery.
Allegations are only allegations until proven - so the messiness you speak of does not mean anything on either direction. When you are defending yourself against these allegations, you can force the plaintiff to produce material thats pertinent. That material, coming from the plaintiff's side, can easily be damning and something they were trying to hide while lobbing false accusations.
This kind of thing happens all the time. Take an extreme example - Jeffrey Archer's libel case.
He not only lobbed accusations of libel but also won the lawsuit. But later it came out that he had fabricated false evidence and HE went to prison.
They both paid their own attorneys!
Stupid is as stupid does.