You seem to not understand that it was a traveler and explorer describing in his journals a single horned rhinoceros that he encountered while India.
The artists of the time and through into the Middle Ages took that description that was an actual factual description of a creature that exists and twisted into the myths your referring to.
The problem i am debating you about is exactly why I mentioned it and thank you proving and illustrating my point.
Man this guy stretches desperately to prove unicorns are real
I’m proving many things within that statement, but yes your sharp. unicorns are real.
You’re*
So someone wrote about a unicorn in ancient history, therefore they’re real
You know they also wrote about giants, cyclops, hydra, and talking swans too right?
You seem to not understand that it was a traveler and explorer describing in his journals a single horned rhinoceros that he encountered while India.
The artists of the time and through into the Middle Ages took that description that was an actual factual description of a creature that exists and twisted into the myths your referring to.
The problem i am debating you about is exactly why I mentioned it and thank you proving and illustrating my point.
You're trying really hard to justify why the myth is a good thing
where's the sightings of these unicorns and giants and cyclops and hydra
where are the remnants
when you can provide anecdotal proof of suspicion vs anecdotal proof of chemtrails, then you can make another reply. until then stop commenting here.
No remnants that I’m aware of. That’s my point