Catturd ™ "What a joke."...In Response to... "David Pecker just testified that their is no written agreement or evidence of an agreement anywhere. He says it was just verbal and understood."...( Trump hush money trial: Who is David Pecker, the first witness?) - The Great Awakening

Catturd ™ "What a joke."...In Response to... "David Pecker just testified that their is no written agreement or evidence of an agreement anywhere. He says it was just verbal and understood."...( Trump hush money trial: Who is David Pecker, the first witness?) (twitter.com)

posted 208 days ago by purkiss80 208 days ago by purkiss80 +96 / -2

37 comments

37 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (37)

sorted by:

▲ 15 ▼

– TNBanjoMan 15 points 208 days ago +15 / -0

An already weak case just got even weaker.

permalink save report block reply

▲ -6 ▼

– Switch3track -6 points 208 days ago +2 / -8

You better read Peckers testimony when he’s done. He is not helping Trumps case at all.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– Standingoak 7 points 208 days ago +7 / -0

He is a Pecker........he is not supposed to help , just support the lies.

No man calleth for justice: no man contendeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak vain things: they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity. --Isaiah 59:4 1599 Geneva Bible

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– brimshae 3 points 208 days ago +3 / -0

David Peckerhead.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– TheVerboten1 2 points 208 days ago +2 / -0

Michael Obama has a pecker.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q