Ok I see the gateway Pundit link now. GAW has that formatting error where it doesn't recognize line breaks.
My name is who is kidding who because I'm trying to stop kidding myself. I have had an issue with GWP because too often the stories they wrote don't match their sources. If you follow the links, the news they rely on is different.
I realized their business model is telling us what we want to hear, not what is so. Let's see what they say
DA Bragg’s case is in serious trouble. The gang behind the prosecution of President Trump made a serious error that should lead President Trump’s team to move to dismiss.
Prosecutors in New York have revealed what the other crime is that Donald Trump was allegedly trying to conceal when he was falsifying business records and they claim it was to unlawfully promote his candidacy. The fatal error is that the NY Statute they cite only applies to elections within the State of New York and not Federal Elections!
Trump was running for the federal office of President of the United States and not a State Office and therefore the premise of what the prosecution is trying to prove as the second crime used to get around the statute of limitations issue and to elevate this business records case to a felony must fail!!
But even before we actually look at the law, Trump's got big attorneys working for him. If there's an obvious issue with this, they'd raise it in court.
Also, before looking at the law there seems to be a big mistake here. I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me elections for federal office are subject state election laws. When you are registered to vote in New York and you vote for Trump for president, you do that within New York election laws. Like in New York state if you want to vote for Donald Trump for president in 2024, You have to be registered in the state of New York by October 26, 2024.
I think GWP is telling us what we want to hear here, not actually providing legal analysis.
Do you see how the GWP article is attributed to a guest contributof? But that person is never mentioned. They quote something but again no link?
I'm just looked into the argument and it brought me to an oped in the NY Times
I'm 95% sure this "guest contributor" is Joe Hoft reading this argument in the NY Times or hearing about this op ed, but he doesn't want his readers to know this is from the NY Times.
Ok I see the gateway Pundit link now. GAW has that formatting error where it doesn't recognize line breaks.
My name is who is kidding who because I'm trying to stop kidding myself. I have had an issue with GWP because too often the stories they wrote don't match their sources. If you follow the links, the news they rely on is different.
I realized their business model is telling us what we want to hear, not what is so. Let's see what they say
Remember what I said about GWP and links?
They didn't even provide a link here. Here's the law they are talking about. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ELN/17-152
But even before we actually look at the law, Trump's got big attorneys working for him. If there's an obvious issue with this, they'd raise it in court.
Also, before looking at the law there seems to be a big mistake here. I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me elections for federal office are subject state election laws. When you are registered to vote in New York and you vote for Trump for president, you do that within New York election laws. Like in New York state if you want to vote for Donald Trump for president in 2024, You have to be registered in the state of New York by October 26, 2024.
I think GWP is telling us what we want to hear here, not actually providing legal analysis.
Could very well be... Great breakdown btw... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Haha.
I think I just discovered something.
Do you see how the GWP article is attributed to a guest contributof? But that person is never mentioned. They quote something but again no link?
I'm just looked into the argument and it brought me to an oped in the NY Times
I'm 95% sure this "guest contributor" is Joe Hoft reading this argument in the NY Times or hearing about this op ed, but he doesn't want his readers to know this is from the NY Times.
Interdasting... You're probably right though... Cheers fren.. ☕️☕️☕️