ATF Unlawfully Changes Definition: Are You Now Considered A ‘Gun Dealer’?
(sonsoflibertymedia.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Commerce Clause issues, possibly the unconstitutional regulatory change could lead to a new Supreme Court case and reign it in back to original Constitution meaning of interstate commerce. a) In the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, Justice Alito in his secondary role as Circuit Judge wrote a great dissent in **U.S. **v. Ryan where Alito considered it an overreach of the commerce clause by the federal government to convict Ryan for possession of an outlawed gun. https://casetext.com/case/us-v-rybar-103-f3d-273 ____ b) Alito’s dissent in a) + a review of a 1990’s appellate court decision that the federal court had jurisdiction up to a third sale of a gun first brought in 1 state from state 2 (sorry, I forgot this case name from c. 1996) could ——> (lead to) c) a future Supreme Court decision reigning in federal exercise of commerce clause power in relation to the 2nd Amendment. ____. My favorite constitutional law citizens’ link: Supreme Law Firm https://www.supremelaw.org
...informative addendum...
...thanks for sharing...
Thanks, your topic post here and thread is important. Paul Mitchell put in a lot of work as Supreme Law Firm, retired for past 6 years. I just found the 1990s case where the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals held that Bureau AT [F]ibbers has jurisdiction over the “first sale” of a firearm brought in to the country. U.S. v. F.J. Vollmer & Co.. 1 F.3d 1511 (1993). https://casetext.com/case/us-v-fj-vollmer-co-inc. (search “first sale” in text to find relevant section /understanding of the Commerce Clause application)
...more great information...
...please share this article, this needs to be seen...