Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
It's cute how you numbered the response to make it sound more authoritative. I'm confused though, did I miscount? His name is 12 letters, right? Or is Trump exempt?
You mentioned avoiding discussion in your rambling response, but you are the one who avoided my question. I'm seriously asking if Trump is exempt and if so, why? I'm trying to understand. You defined the parameters. Teach me
Donald J Trump - also 12 letters. I guess he's also part of the 12 tribes of Israel?
It's cute how you numbered the response to make it sound more authoritative. I'm confused though, did I miscount? His name is 12 letters, right? Or is Trump exempt?
You mentioned avoiding discussion in your rambling response, but you are the one who avoided my question. I'm seriously asking if Trump is exempt and if so, why? I'm trying to understand. You defined the parameters. Teach me
https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
The fact that you just dropped a cryptome link is boner worthy.
Fags like you give me raging boners