☝️☝️☝️

she's really sauceless.

very hard to look up what she is saying.

OK I found the document. It's an exhibit tied to Jack Smith's motion GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO DONALD J. TRUMP'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT BASED ON PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS

it's exhibit 2 at the end. And it's not the whole transcript. You don't know why he is front of the grand jury. it starts on page 13 then jumps to page 41.

So it's probably discussed elsewhere https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/d91bdc599b5ce490/bfd275aa-full.pdf

Yeah, Smith is responding to an ealier motion from Trump

Trump first focuses on an exchange in the grand jury between a prosecutor and Trump's then- lawyer, who testified as a custodian of records to describe Trump's compliance with the subpoena for documents with classification markings. The prosecutor explained to the attorney that "we are not seeking today to elicit from you privileged information, ” and the attorney claimed privilege numerous times over the course of the 245- page grand jury transcript. **Because the attorney was offered as a records custodian, the Government could inquire into the nature and adequacy of any search for responsive documents. **Those topics were "not off limits just because an attorney play[ ed] a role, ” and Trump could not “ throw the veil of privilege over details of how files were searched, and by whom, through the expedient of involving a lawyer in the process. "

So I'm guessing he was there as a fact witness into how the search for documents responsive to the subpoena was conducted.