OK I found the document. It's an exhibit tied to Jack Smith's motion
GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO DONALD J. TRUMP'S
MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT BASED ON
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS
it's exhibit 2 at the end.
And it's not the whole transcript. You don't know why he is front of the grand jury.
it starts on page 13 then jumps to page 41.
Yeah, Smith is responding to an ealier motion from Trump
Trump first focuses on an exchange in the grand jury between a prosecutor
and Trump's then- lawyer, who testified as a custodian of records to describe Trump's compliance with the subpoena for documents with classification markings. The prosecutor explained to the attorney that "we are not seeking today to elicit from you privileged information, ” and the attorney claimed privilege numerous times over the course of the 245- page grand jury transcript. **Because the attorney was offered as a records custodian, the Government could inquire
into the nature and adequacy of any search for responsive documents. **Those topics were "not off limits just because an attorney play[ ed] a role, ” and Trump could not “ throw the veil of privilege over details of how files were searched, and by whom, through the expedient of involving a lawyer
in the process. "
So I'm guessing he was there as a fact witness into how the search for documents responsive to the subpoena was conducted.
Another jew.
Every. Single. Time.
☝️☝️☝️
I am not surprised.
Are we at war a psycho or a information war or a battle for humanity and heart and soul of the Holy Spirit
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1yEoJ5a/jack-smith-subordinate-tried-to-/c/
Why was Trump's ex lawyer in front of the grand jury?
Privilege would still apply even if he was not currently Trump's lawyer.
I don't know enough to answer that. After all, I am just a brain_dead
she's really sauceless.
very hard to look up what she is saying.
OK I found the document. It's an exhibit tied to Jack Smith's motion GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO DONALD J. TRUMP'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT BASED ON PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS
it's exhibit 2 at the end. And it's not the whole transcript. You don't know why he is front of the grand jury. it starts on page 13 then jumps to page 41.
So it's probably discussed elsewhere https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/d91bdc599b5ce490/bfd275aa-full.pdf
Yeah, Smith is responding to an ealier motion from Trump
So I'm guessing he was there as a fact witness into how the search for documents responsive to the subpoena was conducted.
I see what you are talking about. Thanks for pointing it out. Appreciate the information. You are right, jumped from page 13 to 41.
They are just doing whatever they can to get him. Just the most ridiculous.