I listened/watched this as well as his Oxford U lecture on his research and proof and am currently going thru his book. So far, things check out.
One thing I haven't looked into yet is his claim that he and his "collective" hold over 90 patents for various technologies, including AR/VR tech. His claim in this is that he invented the process which allows AR/VR to become a reality, but was basically screwed out of the money dozens of companies have earned from this.
Does anyone know if patents are searchable by the holder's name?
Also, here's the link to his website where you can download a PDF of his book: https://tcotlc.com/
I suggest everyone here listen to the JRE episode, watch his Oxford U lecture, then read the book and get to running the equations yourself, and then get to digging.
If Terrence Howard is correct (and I suspect he is), he won't be remembered as just a talented actor, he'll be primarily remembered as the man who revolutionized modern mathematics, physics, quantum mechanics, chemical engineering, and other disciplines.
The fact that the mainstream gatekeepers of academia won't debate him, much less review his work says all I need to know about the implications here.
I listened/watched this as well as his Oxford U lecture on his research and proof and am currently going thru his book. So far, things check out.
One thing I haven't looked into yet is his claim that he and his "collective" hold over 90 patents for various technologies, including AR/VR tech. His claim in this is that he invented the process which allows AR/VR to become a reality, but was basically screwed out of the money dozens of companies have earned from this.
Does anyone know if patents are searchable by the holder's name?
Also, here's the link to his website where you can download a PDF of his book: https://tcotlc.com/
I suggest everyone here listen to the JRE episode, watch his Oxford U lecture, then read the book and get to running the equations yourself, and then get to digging.
If Terrence Howard is correct (and I suspect he is), he won't be remembered as just a talented actor, he'll be primarily remembered as the man who revolutionized modern mathematics, physics, quantum mechanics, chemical engineering, and other disciplines.
The fact that the mainstream gatekeepers of academia won't debate him, much less review his work says all I need to know about the implications here.
Really? Expand on this, please.