Look at the picture. The collapse of tower punched through the parts it hit like swiss cheese. It's like if you blasted through a door with a shotgun. You wouldn't say the door stood up.
You are correct. The original post is wrong to say that only the top floor is damaged, but that’s not really the point. Building 6 looks like one would expect it to look after the collapse of the twin towers. Building 7 looks waaaay different because it was imploded.
How come this building didn't collapse at freefall speed?
WTC 6 suffered immediate catastrophic damage.
Have you seen this?
https://projects.voanews.com/ground-zero/images/800x-wtc6_9-11_credit_u.s._navy_photo_by_chief_photographer_s_mate_eric_j._tilford.jpg
You are correct, but the point is that building 6 did not freefall
I don't understand the distinction you're making.
Look at the picture. The collapse of tower punched through the parts it hit like swiss cheese. It's like if you blasted through a door with a shotgun. You wouldn't say the door stood up.
You are correct. The original post is wrong to say that only the top floor is damaged, but that’s not really the point. Building 6 looks like one would expect it to look after the collapse of the twin towers. Building 7 looks waaaay different because it was imploded.
that's what a building damaged by normal means looks like.
The OP's claim that the only the roof of WTC 6 was damaged is false.
Well sure but which looks more damaged, this or building 7?