Judge: To convict Trump of felonies, jury does not need to unanimously agree on what 'predicate' crime he committed
(www.politico.com)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
Wow, that's great news! That means all the deep staters on Ivan The Terrible's hit list can be rounded up and we won't have to agree as to what the crime was...think Coment Pizza... just that something fishy is going on and the people there look creepy as hell. Guilty! Next.
That will save the taxpayers a lot of money. We could get through those 300,000 (ir whatever?) sealed indictments in a day or two. Three maybe , if we want to give the illusion we're actually thinking about the verdict
That's not what this ruling says.
It says “We”(judge and prosecutor) think he’s guilty as fuck of something. We can’t agree on what it is specifically, but no matter. Like a Soviet court, bring in the guilty party and we’ll find the crime. Here they can’t even do that.
The Democrat communist apparatchiks need to convict Trump of something, anything. They are trying to frame him with novel theories, smear him with accusations in an attempt to thwart his popularity. Never mind every legal scholar thinks the cases against him should have been thrown out long ago.
Never mind that Merchan’s daughter is raking in $millions working for the Democrat party. That alone should have caused him to recuse himself from day one.
In clown world reality is turned on its head. It’s apparent to everyone that their desperation is so blatant it can only come from a place of fear. Fear of their own crimes coming to light if they fail to get him off the ballot. That’s what this ruling says to me.