How many coincidence's until it is mathematically impossible? - The Great Awakening

How many coincidence's until it is mathematically impossible? 🔍 Notable

posted 208 days ago by BGridd 208 days ago by BGridd +52 / -0

I started making a reply for a few threads, but this is long enough for a post as instead.

The followin is duplicatable observations about some of these coincedences.

This post will focus on some of the patterns of 7.

7 is mentioned as the number for spiritual perfection. There is much more information on various numbers and the meanings of each but that is not the focus of this post. many more patterns are also available at https://truthischrist.com/ There is quite a bit of work done by the site owner. In checking the work and conclusions presented and #'s/patterns, so far I can only confirm his findings. and only in the KJV

Here are just a few. Total words spoken by God in Genesis 1 = 343 words = 7×7×7 words In Matthew 1, the first chapter of the New Testament, the Lord speaks exactly 7×7 words to Joseph, and doesn’t speak anywhere else in the chapter. Total words spoken by God in Matthew 1 = 49 words = 7×7 words Total words spoken by God in all 7 days of creation = 7×7×7 = 7³ Total words spoken by God on Day 4 of creation = 7×7 = 7² Total words spoken by God in Matthew 1 = 7×7 = 7² The Godhead – 1 John 5:7 “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.“ The Father + The Word + Holy Ghost = 777 mentions in the Bible God + Jesus + Holy Spirit = (777×3) mentions in the New Testament God + Jesus + his Spirit = (777×7) mentions in the Bible God + Jesus + his Spirit = (777×3) mentions in the New Testament (his Spirit = case-sensitive) Holy One + Father + Son + Spirit = 777 mentions in the Bible = All capitalized, No endings

The question I will leave you with is, Is this enough coincedence's? (There ARE many more)

14 comments

14 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (14)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– deleted 4 points 208 days ago +4 / -0

▲ 2 ▼

– SOGWAP 2 points 208 days ago +3 / -1

King James is just a version done in 1611. It has some direct forgeries that do not have corresponding verses in the Stephen's greek text that they were translated from. It also has plenty of mistranslations or poorly translated words. All the punctuation is man made as the originals were done in uncials and cursive with no punctuation and rare capitalization of letters amd no chapters and verses. Therefore all of the capitalization and punctuations are void of authority. Knowing these things makes it much easier to navigate your studies to get to the God inspired revelation that was given when holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the holy spirit as ALL Scripture is God breathed and given by such inspiration.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– BGridd [S] 1 point 208 days ago +1 / -0

1611 and then 1679, versions do have interesting histories, the concordance version he mentions is my next purchase if I can clear it with the wife.