Let this sink in. IF libertarianism is the ANTI-system to the WEF-system, the anti-system to the ideology of the Church of Schwabism, what is it what Schwab sees and is spouting about like an old grumpy with a large prostate? It is an idea called: Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It is based on the non-aggression principle: Trade with everyone, ally with non.
Think about it. If the High Priests of the Schwabists is an enemy of freedom, an enemy of non-aggression, how do you think he go about it?
This is how it works. A plan hatched and executed over decades. Slowly, relentless.
Exactly! Why? So, you will be crushed from all sides. As Trump would say: everything woke goes to shit.
And this is what can be observed with the libertarian party, a once proud bearer of the free torch, falling to woke ideology.
Min-arch-ist: it could be argued: Thomas Jefferson was a minarchist, In plain english: small government, best government is who governs least (in the words of Judge Nap)
But, what many libertarians forget, is that for freedom to reign, virtue is required. Look at all these so called libertarian investor Billionaires. When looking at these people, one could be forgiven to be confused of what libertarian actually means.
That is why, I think, Trump made overtures to bridge a gap, not towards those totally brainwashed WEF-cult members, but those people who genuinely hold in high honor both freedom and virtue.
Deregulation
Smaller government
Clean House
End the Endless wars, no new wars. Peace through strength.
Solve the debt situation
Solve the money & currency situation
Close the border, evict the invaders.
Lower tax-burden
And recognition that taxation is theft; Inflation is theft.
As I said below, it is often difficult to allow for a transition period in order to arrive at a point desired. Many Libertarians are blind towards how to move from A to F. If something does not conform to rule 1, it is rejected, due to philosophical & political puritanism Practical solutions often escape them.
But I think for those listening through the Object Oriented Programming instituted by the, what seems to be, loud woke part of the crowd, there is a bridge.
So, in terms of ideas:
Libertarian means: ANTI WEF. If you do not belief me, perhaps you will belief Klaus Schwab.
https://iv.melmac.space/watch?v=JqwfgXSYU-o&t=607
The remarks are @ 10 minutes into the video.
Let this sink in. IF libertarianism is the ANTI-system to the WEF-system, the anti-system to the ideology of the Church of Schwabism, what is it what Schwab sees and is spouting about like an old grumpy with a large prostate? It is an idea called: Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It is based on the non-aggression principle: Trade with everyone, ally with non.
Think about it. If the High Priests of the Schwabists is an enemy of freedom, an enemy of non-aggression, how do you think he go about it?
Infiltration? Subversion? RE-direction? War? Anything goes, right?
Let's hear from this mentally perverted zealot from his own mouth: https://iv.melmac.space/watch?v=SjxJ1wPnkk4
This is how it works. A plan hatched and executed over decades. Slowly, relentless.
Exactly! Why? So, you will be crushed from all sides. As Trump would say: everything woke goes to shit.
And this is what can be observed with the libertarian party, a once proud bearer of the free torch, falling to woke ideology.
Min-arch-ist: it could be argued: Thomas Jefferson was a minarchist, In plain english: small government, best government is who governs least (in the words of Judge Nap)
But, what many libertarians forget, is that for freedom to reign, virtue is required. Look at all these so called libertarian investor Billionaires. When looking at these people, one could be forgiven to be confused of what libertarian actually means.
That is why, I think, Trump made overtures to bridge a gap, not towards those totally brainwashed WEF-cult members, but those people who genuinely hold in high honor both freedom and virtue.
As I said below, it is often difficult to allow for a transition period in order to arrive at a point desired. Many Libertarians are blind towards how to move from A to F. If something does not conform to rule 1, it is rejected, due to philosophical & political puritanism Practical solutions often escape them.
But I think for those listening through the Object Oriented Programming instituted by the, what seems to be, loud woke part of the crowd, there is a bridge.
Trump as the Pontifex (=bridge builder) Maximus.
...compelling addendum, nicely stated and framed...