Every Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sits Out Decision of a decision in Brunson Case in Rare Move - The Great Awakening

Every Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sits Out Decision of a decision in Brunson Case in Rare Move (www.newsweek.com) Corrupt Courts U S A

posted 162 days ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid 162 days ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid +214 / -2

Every liberal Supreme Court justice sits out decision in rare move

The liberal Supreme Court justices were previously named as defendants in the case they sat out of.

24 comments

24 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (24)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– summerstormAK 8 points 162 days ago +8 / -0

Does the Supreme Court require a quorum to act?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 10 ▼

– DagnyDocket 10 points 162 days ago +10 / -0

Yes, any 6.

The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20of%20the,whom%20shall%20constitute%20a%20quorum.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– summerstormAK 3 points 162 days ago +3 / -0

So if three opt out, they win by default? Lovely.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 9 ▼

– Etmb55 9 points 162 days ago +9 / -0

The Chief Justice counts as a member and he, along with the 8 associate justices equal 9. If three opt out, there is still 6 remaining members which constitutes the quorum necessary to act.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q