Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks' ban is unlawful
(www.nbcnews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I say this with so much contempt, disgust, and disrespect that she deserves; What a dumb ass fucking bitch. (Sotomayor)
Legal definition of a "Machinegun"
SOURCE: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5845
To reiterate; Legally (and technically correct) a "machinegun" is a firearm that shoots more than one round with ONE pull of the trigger.
Perfect example; burst. If you squeeze the trigger ONCE, and 3 bullets are shot by the gun AUTOMATICALLY.
Know how many rounds are discharged by a firearm equipped with a bump stock?
One. Each. Time. You. Pull. The. Trigger.
When you pull the trigger on a bump-stock equipped rifle, ONE bullet is shot. It isn't until you pull the trigger a SECOND TIME that another shot is fired.
Sotomayor just said that a chicken has 2 legs, makes weird noises and lays eggs, therefore a chicken is a duck.
Nope; 2 completely & totally different animals.
So dishonest. Not that I'd expect anything else from the commies, but stil......
Thank you for sharing this. They have always lied to push their agenda.
LITERALLY always...... Never forget that.
Yet Schumer attempted to make a law banning them despite this ruling.